Skill UI

This guide outlines the professional and technical process for authors responding to peer reviewers after a major conference submission (e.g., ICDT). It emphasizes that the revision must be a substantive correction—closing all identified proofs gaps, clarifying models, and documenting changes—rather than a mere argument or debate over taste. It provides a structured, point-by-point approach for maximizing the chances of acceptance.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring technical conference papers, especially when supplementary proofs are required. It emphasizes the critical rule that the main body (typically 15 pages) must be self-contained and sufficient for a referee to judge the result's significance, even if they do not read the marked appendix. It strictly forbids external links or online supplements for review.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors to position their work against existing literature, concurrent submissions, and public scrutiny in top-tier AI conferences. It teaches how to separate similar components from identical scientific problems, build verifiable novelty claims, and respond robustly to reviewer challenges.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and polishing scholarly review articles for a broad academic audience. It ensures the writing adopts an authoritative, highly accessible, and forward-looking narrative arc, guiding the author to move beyond mere summary and establish a clear research agenda.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the comprehensive, multi-stage academic journal review process, modeled after top-tier Chinese journals like CJC. It covers the entire lifecycle, from initial editorial screening and double-blind expert review to revision and final acceptance. Use it to strategically plan your submission rhythm, anticipate required revisions, and scientifically strengthen your manuscript to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers, particularly in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). It teaches how to adopt the measurement-forward, evidence-based register required by top-tier conferences like COLM. Focus areas include leading with findings, strictly scoping claims to tested models and versions, structuring content for tight page limits, and maintaining a measured, critical voice.

Provides a comprehensive guide for drafting academic abstracts for top-tier public administration journals, such as Chinese Public Administration (CPA). It enforces a strict four-part structure (Question $\rightarrow$ Theory $\rightarrow$ Findings $\rightarrow$ Contribution), ensures semantic alignment between Chinese and English versions, and guides authors on avoiding vague, empty phrases. Use this guide when revising manuscripts before submission to meet high journal standards.

A comprehensive guide for researchers responding to 'Revise and Resubmit' (R&R) decisions, particularly in Comparative Political Studies. It provides a structured framework for drafting the response letter, ensuring every point from reviewers and editors is addressed point-by-point. Focus areas include strengthening comparative leverage, addressing rival explanations, and maintaining professional, evidence-based argumentation.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to reviewer critiques during a Revise and Resubmit cycle. It covers project management of complex revisions, strategic triage of feedback (Do, Decline, Cannot), structuring the point-by-point response letter, and maintaining a professional, collegial tone to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

This skill guides researchers through the entire end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a research paper to a journal. It structures a 12-step pipeline, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature review to experimentation, reproducibility, submission, peer review, revision, and final camera-ready versioning. It acts as a comprehensive project dashboard for managing the entire academic publishing journey.

This comprehensive guide polishes academic manuscripts for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on refining rhetoric by eliminating vague, empty-significance phrases and improving policy recommendations. The skill helps authors transition from mere statistical reporting to articulating clear economic implications, ensuring consistency in tense, person, and terminology.