Skill UI

Provides comprehensive guidelines for selecting and rigorously justifying research designs across various academic paradigms: qualitative/ethnographic, critical, quantitative, and mixed-methods. This guide ensures the chosen methodology aligns perfectly with the theoretical question, emphasizing rigor, transparency, and advanced methodological considerations for academic manuscripts in Human Relations.

This guide helps structure, audit, and refine the exhibits (tables and figures) for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations. It ensures that the inference path from raw data to theoretical claims is visible. It covers best practices for both qualitative exhibits (data-structure models, evidence tables) and quantitative exhibits (regression models, interaction plots), while adhering to submission constraints like anonymization and word limits.

A comprehensive guide for developing theory in the field of Human Relations (HR). This skill helps users move beyond simple constructs and box-and-arrow diagrams to build substantive theoretical arguments. It focuses on defining generative social mechanisms, grounding theory in social processes, specifying boundary conditions, and aligning theoretical form (process vs. variance) with the research phenomenon.

A comprehensive guide for generating and packaging reproducible evidence for signal processing submissions to ICASSP. It details what reviewers prioritize (scoring scripts, dataset splits, logs) and outlines best practices to ensure that headline metrics are easily regenerated, thereby maximizing review credibility and post-publication impact.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting signal processing papers, detailing how to achieve rigorous reproducibility for conferences like ICASSP. It emphasizes that simply providing a model is insufficient; authors must pin down the 'scoring ruler,' data versions, front-end parameters, and computational seeds to ensure every reported metric can be independently verified.

A comprehensive guide detailing the ICASSP peer review pipeline, covering single-blind review mechanics, technical committee evaluation criteria, and the strategic importance of evidence, significance, and reproducibility in signal processing papers. Use this to craft submission strategies and decode decision letters.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting papers to ICASSP conferences. This checklist covers crucial requirements such as the mandatory 4+1 page format, single-blind review rules (including author list inclusion), CMS portal submission protocols, EDICS metadata selection, and compliance with ethical standards. Use this guide before the deadline to avoid desk rejects.

A comprehensive guide for researchers determining the best conference or journal for their signal processing contribution. It helps users identify the core signal-processing primitive (e.g., estimator, transform, representation) to correctly route work between major venues like ICASSP, Interspeech, ICIP, or general ML conferences.

A comprehensive guide modeling the ICCV review pipeline, covering the entire cycle from registration to final decision (March-June). It details author responsibilities, the enforcement of reviewer accountability, the prohibition of LLM use in reviews, and strategies for authors to interpret and leverage diverse review feedback, including utilizing the 'Findings' workshop.

A comprehensive guide for positioning database research papers for top-tier conferences like ICDE. It teaches authors how to distinguish genuine novelty (new mechanisms) from engineering delta (implementation improvements), conduct deep literature audits, and compare their work against both academic venues and real-world production systems. Essential for improving manuscript eligibility and impact.

This guide outlines comprehensive standards for scientific reproducibility in data engineering. It details best practices for pinning hardware, software, datasets, and variance protocols, ensuring that all performance claims are verifiable and re-runnable by peers, making reproducibility a scored component of academic submission.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous, multi-stage peer review process for top-tier data engineering conferences like ICDE. It details the two-round structure, area-chair coordination, single-blind dynamics, and the high standards set by 'builder-heavy' reviewers. Use this to strategize paper submission, understand key evaluation dimensions (novelty, soundness, evaluation), and anticipate common review objections.