Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the ICASSP peer review pipeline, covering single-blind review mechanics, technical committee evaluation criteria, and the strategic importance of evidence, significance, and reproducibility in signal processing papers. Use this to craft submission strategies and decode decision letters.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting papers to ICASSP conferences. This checklist covers crucial requirements such as the mandatory 4+1 page format, single-blind review rules (including author list inclusion), CMS portal submission protocols, EDICS metadata selection, and compliance with ethical standards. Use this guide before the deadline to avoid desk rejects.

A comprehensive guide for researchers determining the best conference or journal for their signal processing contribution. It helps users identify the core signal-processing primitive (e.g., estimator, transform, representation) to correctly route work between major venues like ICASSP, Interspeech, ICIP, or general ML conferences.

A comprehensive guide modeling the ICCV review pipeline, covering the entire cycle from registration to final decision (March-June). It details author responsibilities, the enforcement of reviewer accountability, the prohibition of LLM use in reviews, and strategies for authors to interpret and leverage diverse review feedback, including utilizing the 'Findings' workshop.

A comprehensive guide for positioning database research papers for top-tier conferences like ICDE. It teaches authors how to distinguish genuine novelty (new mechanisms) from engineering delta (implementation improvements), conduct deep literature audits, and compare their work against both academic venues and real-world production systems. Essential for improving manuscript eligibility and impact.

This guide outlines comprehensive standards for scientific reproducibility in data engineering. It details best practices for pinning hardware, software, datasets, and variance protocols, ensuring that all performance claims are verifiable and re-runnable by peers, making reproducibility a scored component of academic submission.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous, multi-stage peer review process for top-tier data engineering conferences like ICDE. It details the two-round structure, area-chair coordination, single-blind dynamics, and the high standards set by 'builder-heavy' reviewers. Use this to strategize paper submission, understand key evaluation dimensions (novelty, soundness, evaluation), and anticipate common review objections.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed for authors submitting data-engineering systems papers to major conferences like ICDE. It covers critical areas including IEEE formatting standards, round selection strategy, Microsoft CMT conflict declarations, and the requirement for supplemental material, ensuring authors mitigate common desk-reject risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for ICDE conferences. It details how to properly segment content into the main 12-page body versus the supplementary material, ensuring the core argument remains self-contained while providing reviewers with runnable artifacts, extended experiments, and full technical documentation.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging research artifacts (code, data, logs) for submission to data mining conferences like ICDM. The focus is on ensuring the artifact is completely anonymous for triple-blind review (scrubbing Git history, paths, and internal names) and maximizing reproducibility, allowing reviewers to verify results with minimal effort.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for top-tier data mining conferences (e.g., ICDM). It emphasizes the critical strategy of preemptively addressing potential weaknesses—such as baselines, variance, scaling, and data leakage—directly within the submitted manuscript, as author rebuttals are often not permitted. Also provides strict guidelines for drafting anonymous, high-impact responses if a rebuttal window is available.

A comprehensive guide for researchers designing and auditing empirical evaluations for data mining papers (e.g., ICDM). It teaches how to structure a trustworthy evaluation by defining operational tasks, conducting ablation studies to isolate mechanisms, proving scalability, and implementing known-truth checks to ensure findings are valid and not mere artifacts.