Skill UI

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

This skill guides researchers on how to triage numerous robustness checks for short-format academic manuscripts (e.g., AER: Insights) constrained by word and exhibit limits. It teaches the 'minimum credible set' approach: identifying the 1-2 core checks that defend the central hypothesis for the main text, while systematically moving all supplementary checks to the Appendix and properly signposting them in one sentence to maintain credibility.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for structuring appendices and supplementary materials for high-level academic journals. It helps authors manage the balance between main text conciseness and academic completeness by clearly defining what belongs in the core narrative (main findings) versus what should be reserved for the supplementary section (detailed proofs, extended experiments, raw data, and multimedia).

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous standards for structuring pure mathematics manuscripts, specifically detailing the proper use of appendices and auxiliary material. It teaches authors how to distinguish between the essential core argument (which must remain in the main text) and supplementary technical results, long computations, or background lemmas (which belong in the appendix). This ensures the main text remains focused while maintaining academic rigor and verifiability for peer review.

This guide provides best practices for organizing supplementary material and appendices in major conference submissions. It teaches authors how to maintain the core 11-page body's self-contained integrity while including necessary details (like full configurations, extended result grids, and full proofs) in appendices, ensuring the work remains robust even if reviewers do not read the supplemental content.

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting scientific papers to major conferences. It details the strategic placement of supplementary material across the main body, in-PDF appendices, and external anonymous artifacts. Learn how to maximize impact and provide necessary evidence while strictly adhering to page limits and respecting reviewer attention economics.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring long-form academic papers submitted to the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It teaches authors how to strategically divide content into the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasizes that all decision-making evidence required for acceptance must reside in the main manuscript, while supporting details, full proofs, and extra tables belong in supplementary sections.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

This guide outlines the strategic allocation of content—such as results, methods, and limitations—into the main body, appendix, or artifact for academic submissions. The core principle is 'decision-criticality': any information a reviewer must read to accept the paper must reside in the main body, ensuring key findings are not hidden in supplementary materials or repositories.

A guide for structuring rigorous economic policy manuscripts for a dual audience. It dictates that the main text must be non-technical and policy-first, written accessibly for policymakers, while all technical derivations, proofs, and full estimators are relegated to the appendix to maintain academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer review and editorial board reports for top-tier academic journals. It covers the correct revision sequencing (manuscript first, then letter), structures for point-by-point replies, strategies for accepting, partially accepting, or rebutting reviewer comments, and deciding the optimal placement of supplementary analysis (body vs. appendix).