Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors on crafting structured, professional response letters to academic peer reviews. It covers classifying different revision types (Minor/Major), structuring responses for top-tier journals, addressing conflicting expert opinions, and ensuring all modifications are precisely documented and verifiable for successful publication.

A comprehensive guide on structuring and writing the 'Related Work' and literature review sections for high-impact, comprehensive computer science journals. It emphasizes establishing the research gap (the 'delta'), structuring comparisons (Classification-Comparison-Gap), balancing literature coverage (classic vs. modern, local vs. global), and adhering to academic citation norms (e.g., GB/T 7714). Essential for authors needing to clearly define their novelty in a cross-disciplinary context.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring long-form academic papers submitted to the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It teaches authors how to strategically divide content into the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasizes that all decision-making evidence required for acceptance must reside in the main manuscript, while supporting details, full proofs, and extra tables belong in supplementary sections.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with detailed standards for preparing high-quality, publishable scientific manuscripts for the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It covers critical academic elements, including writing the four-element reporting abstract, structuring the narrative (Introduction, Methods, Experiments), maintaining consistent terminology and symbols, adhering to Chinese legislative units, and mastering the GB/T 7714 citation format. It ensures the final submission meets the rigorous linguistic and structural demands of top-tier academic journals.

This skill provides a structured framework for responding to external referee reports in academic publishing. It guides authors through classifying reviewer comments, planning necessary revisions (experiments, derivations), and drafting meticulous point-by-point rebuttal letters. It emphasizes that the reply must accurately reflect actual changes made to the manuscript, ensuring professional and compliant academic communication.

This comprehensive guide serves as a pre-flight checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for journal submission. It details critical formal requirements, such as strict page limits, mandatory structural elements (e.g., Chinese classification numbers), formula formatting, and adherence to the official submission portal guidelines. Use it to avoid common formatting errors and ensure a smooth initial review process.

A comprehensive methodological guide for authors positioning their empirical manuscripts within a theoretical debate, particularly for high-level journals like Cognitive Psychology. It teaches authors to move beyond simple literature reviews by identifying a clear theoretical question, naming specific rival models, and demonstrating precisely why existing evidence is insufficient to resolve the conflict. This structure ensures the contribution is framed as an adjudication or a novel model.

A comprehensive guide for drafting or polishing long-form, integrative manuscripts for cognitive psychology journals. It teaches authors how to weave multiple experiments and formal models into a single, continuous theoretical argument, ensuring rigorous structure, narrative flow, and adherence to APA-style statistical reporting.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing academic rebuttals for major conferences. It details time budgeting, how to address common reviewer objections with concrete evidence, and best practices for maintaining professional credibility throughout the intense review cycle.

This comprehensive guide provides expert protocols for writing the 'Related Work' section in Machine Learning papers. It teaches authors how to maintain 'versioned honesty' by meticulously triaging the literature into distinct lanes (e.g., method lineage, model artifacts, evaluation infrastructure). It covers advanced topics like managing concurrent work, citing arXiv status accurately, and avoiding self-citation violations, ensuring the paper is positioned rigorously within the rapidly evolving academic field.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous submission process for major academic conferences like COLM. It covers strict formatting rules (e.g., 9-page limit), maintaining double-blind anonymity, mandatory LLM usage disclosure, and techniques for preventing identity leaks through technical sweeps. Essential reading for authors navigating the complex academic publishing lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide for drafting author responses to highly technical peer reviews in top-tier theoretical conferences. Learn how to repair perceived gaps, address objections regarding proof correctness, tightness, and novelty-of-technique, while adhering to specific academic policies and structure.