Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for revising academic prose for top-tier sociological methods journals (SMR). It enforces strict structural rules, covering the mandatory introduction arc (Problem -> Gap -> Contribution -> Evidence -> Payoff), abstract limitations (≤150 words, no parenthetical citations), and disciplinary standards for statistical exposition, citation styles (ASA/DataCite), and manuscript anonymization.

This skill guides users on transforming a sociological manuscript from a descriptive literature review into a sustained, argumentative theoretical piece. It ensures the writing follows rigorous academic standards, adheres to the ASA Style Guide, respects strict length caps (including citations and references), and shifts the focus from summarizing findings to advancing novel theoretical propositions.

A comprehensive guide for advanced academic writing, focusing on transforming mere literature summaries into structured theoretical dialogues. It teaches authors how to establish the historical lineage of a field, identify core scholarly disputes, and strategically position their own research within an ongoing, sophisticated academic conversation, moving beyond simple empirical citation lists.

This comprehensive guide details the critical 'Camera-Ready' stage for manuscripts accepted by *Scientia Sinica Informationis* (SSI). It provides authors with a detailed checklist, covering everything from correcting citations, formatting figures, and reviewing references, to completing administrative tasks like copyright agreements and paying publication fees. Use this guide to ensure your final submission is flawless and ready for professional publication.

A comprehensive guide tailored for authors submitting manuscripts to *Scientia Sinica Informationis* (SSI). It details the mandatory high-impact structural arc (Problem, Gap, Contribution, Evidence, Significance), covers dual-language abstract requirements, and specifies rigorous formatting rules for units, variables, and citations, ensuring adherence to top-tier academic standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing theoretical computer science papers. It details how to position a result within the existing academic lineage, ensuring rigorous citation practices, managing version discrepancies (preprint vs. journal), and honestly comparing bounds against prior work. Essential for meeting the high standards of top-tier conferences like STOC.

This guide provides an expert methodology for writing the 'Related Work' section for top-tier web conferences (like WWW). It teaches authors how to establish the paper's academic lineage, contrast the work against competing venues (e.g., SIGIR, KDD), and manage citation hygiene, ensuring maximum impact within strict page limits.

This guide teaches researchers how to strategically position a paper's contribution within established academic lineages (e.g., click models, LTR). It emphasizes moving beyond simple citation coverage to writing precise 'contrast sentences' that articulate the technical delta, ensuring the work's novelty is clearly defined relative to neighboring venues like SIGIR and KDD. Ideal for authors refining their technical writing for top-tier conferences.

This skill performs a rigorous audit of legal journal footnotes, verifying the existence, pinpoint accuracy, Bluebook formatting, and direct textual support for every citation. It is essential for manuscript preparation, particularly before a source-pull audit, ensuring the piece survives scholarly review without citation errors or integrity issues.

This guide details the rigorous, multi-round editing process for legal scholars submitting to high-level academic journals like The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It trains users on navigating substantive critiques, resolving complex source-pull and citation queries, and adapting the writing process for fast-paced online formats (YLJ Forum). The focus is on maintaining legal integrity and argumentative coherence throughout the intensive revision cycle.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for constructing academically rigorous legal citations, adhering strictly to The Bluebook format and specific journal requirements. It emphasizes the necessity of pinpoint citations, ensuring every law or fact assertion is supported by an authoritative source. Essential for law students, legal scholars, and researchers drafting highly accurate scholarly articles.

This guide details the rigorous, unique evaluation process for academic articles and essays at Yale Law Journal (YLJ). Unlike traditional peer review, student editors conduct anonymous evaluations, focusing heavily on the originality of the claim, the completeness of the apparatus, and crucially, a thorough 'source-pull' where every citation must be rigorously verified and supported by the text. Use this to understand how to structure and prepare manuscripts for scholarly publication.