Skill UI

This skill provides a deep dive into the rigorous multi-stage review process for scientific manuscripts, particularly in field crops. It details editor scope screening, the single-anonymized expert review, and the specific criteria required (e.g., multi-environment data, statistical rigor, general relevance) to prevent desk rejection. Use this knowledge before submission to stress-test your manuscript, anticipate reviewer objections, and structure your findings for maximum scientific impact.

A comprehensive guide for academics on structuring and articulating the core, novel contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly in specialized fields like Game Theory and Economic Behavior. It provides a framework for crafting a single, highly impactful 'contribution sentence' and organizing the claim cascade (Headline, Why Open, Key Idea), ensuring the theoretical advance is immediately legible to specialized editors and reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for authors addressing major revisions (R&R) for high-level journals, particularly in game theory and economics. It details strategies for structuring responses to referees and editors, covering theory corrections, establishing novelty, presenting robust experimental evidence, and improving overall exposition. Use this to ensure your rebuttal is precise, authoritative, and maximizes acceptance chances.

This guide details the unique and transparent submission process for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It clearly explains the roles of the publicly known Editor-in-Charge, anonymous Advisory Editors, and referees, describing the 'single-anonymized' review model. It helps authors set realistic expectations regarding the high standards, low acceptance odds (~15% published), and critical points for improving their manuscripts before submission.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-caliber academic journals like Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It ensures compliance with critical publishing standards, covering abstract length limits (≤250 words), mandatory conference-version disclosures, generative AI declarations, and correct formatting (LaTeX/Word elsarticle). Use this checklist before submitting to Editorial Manager to minimize rejection risks.

This guide details the rigorous evaluation process used by Global Environmental Change (GEC) for manuscripts, including double-anonymized review, initial editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, and the role of interdisciplinary external reviewers. It provides critical insights into common rejection pitfalls and actionable advice on how to structure a paper to maximize its chances of acceptance in academic publishing.

A structured guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions in academic journals. It teaches strategies for managing interdisciplinary reviewer feedback, reconciling conflicting points, protecting the core scientific contribution, and maintaining a professional, persuasive tone when writing the rebuttal letter to the editor.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors drafting the response and rebuttal letter after a journal's revise-and-resubmit (R&R) phase, specifically for Human Resource Management (HRM) journals. It teaches authors how to structure point-by-point responses to address editor priorities, resolve reviewer conflicts, and strengthen core arguments regarding theoretical mechanisms, methodology, and practical implications.

This comprehensive guide provides a mandatory preflight checklist for authors submitting scholarly manuscripts to academic journals. It covers critical requirements including double-blind anonymization, maintaining APA style, data availability statements, and passing the Editor-in-Chief's fit-and-relevance screen. Use this checklist before submitting to maximize acceptance chances and ensure publication readiness.

A specialized guide for structuring and drafting the response letter to reviewers and editors after a manuscript has undergone major revisions (R&R). It emphasizes the academic rigor, theoretical depth, and gracious tone required by high-level journals, particularly those focused on Human Relations. Learn how to handle disagreements, deepen theoretical contributions, and maintain a professional, point-by-point structure.

This guide provides a comprehensive understanding of the Human Relations (HR) journal's two-gate review system. It details the editorial scoping screen, the double-anonymous developmental peer review, and how to accurately interpret various decision types (e.g., Major Revision vs. Reject). It is crucial for authors to calibrate expectations regarding theoretical contribution, process timelines, and strategic decisions about rerouting to sibling journals.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the comprehensive, multi-stage academic journal review process, modeled after top-tier Chinese journals like CJC. It covers the entire lifecycle, from initial editorial screening and double-blind expert review to revision and final acceptance. Use it to strategically plan your submission rhythm, anticipate required revisions, and scientifically strengthen your manuscript to maximize acceptance chances.