Skill UI

This guide provides a tactical framework for drafting high-stakes author responses (rebuttals) to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences. It details how to triage reviewer comments (factual errors, questions, disputes), structure the argument within strict word limits (e.g., 800 words), and maintain a professional, evidence-based tone to maximize the paper's chances of acceptance or major revision.

This comprehensive guide teaches the methodology for crafting professional, evidence-based rebuttal letters in response to demanding peer reviews (e.g., Cell). It instructs users on triaging reviewer comments into actionable categories (Do, Defend, etc.), prioritizing necessary new experiments based on impact and feasibility, and systematically addressing the core 'completeness' gaps demanded by top-tier journals, all while maintaining a respectful and academic tone.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and refining the literature review section of academic manuscripts for top-tier finance and economics journals. It covers the mandatory three-layer structure (Theory, Empirical Evidence, Contribution Gap), optimal Chinese/English citation ratios, and techniques for developing a 'dialogue-based' narrative rather than a simple list, ensuring clear positioning relative to the field's classic theories and recent publications.

This skill provides an authoritative guide for assessing whether a comprehensive review article is suitable for Chemical Reviews (Chem Rev). It details the journal's high standards, emphasizing that submissions must be exhaustive, critically analytical syntheses of the entire field, not primary experimental reports or progress updates. Use this tool to refine scope, structure, and evidence depth before submission, ensuring alignment with the journal's 'invited venue' status.

A comprehensive guide for authors on crafting structured, professional response letters to academic peer reviews. It covers classifying different revision types (Minor/Major), structuring responses for top-tier journals, addressing conflicting expert opinions, and ensuring all modifications are precisely documented and verifiable for successful publication.

A comprehensive guide for structuring literature reviews and clearly positioning novel contributions for top-tier academic journals. It emphasizes the critical "dual-lane" approach: analyzing both local Chinese academic literature and global international research findings. Learn how to define the gap, state the methodological increment, and articulate the unique findings in a structured, dialogue-driven manner, anticipating reviewer questions.

A comprehensive methodological guide for authors positioning their empirical manuscripts within a theoretical debate, particularly for high-level journals like Cognitive Psychology. It teaches authors to move beyond simple literature reviews by identifying a clear theoretical question, naming specific rival models, and demonstrating precisely why existing evidence is insufficient to resolve the conflict. This structure ensures the contribution is framed as an adjudication or a novel model.

A comprehensive guide for drafting author responses to highly technical peer reviews in top-tier theoretical conferences. Learn how to repair perceived gaps, address objections regarding proof correctness, tightness, and novelty-of-technique, while adhering to specific academic policies and structure.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to highly technical conference reviews, particularly focusing on the critical 'one-shot major revision response letter.' It details strategies for maintaining strict double-anonymity, structuring the rebuttal around decision-critical points (soundness, reproducibility), and creating a detailed change ledger to systematically address every minimum necessary change requested by reviewers.

Provides a detailed structural guide for writing high-quality literature reviews, specifically tailored for top-tier journals in Public Administration. It coaches users on transitioning from a simple 'listing' format to a critical 'dialogue' format, ensuring proper theoretical anchoring (e.g., Public Administration theory), balancing international and local literature, and clearly defining the paper's unique contribution and knowledge gaps.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in drafting high-quality, structured literature reviews for top-tier academic journals in rural economics, such as China Rural Economy. It emphasizes shifting from a simple 'listing' format to a nuanced, 'dialogue-based' scholarly discussion. Key areas covered include balancing Chinese and international literature, establishing theoretical frameworks, and clearly articulating the manuscript's unique academic contribution and gap.

This guide provides detailed structural and content requirements for drafting a literature review intended for the Finance & Trade Economics (CTE) journal. It emphasizes shifting from a mere listing of studies to a 'dialogue-based' discussion, balancing international theory with localized Chinese empirical research and institutional context. Key focus areas include the three-layer structure, source balance, and differentiating the paper's unique contribution.