Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing their research paper for the final camera-ready submission at a major academic conference. It details the entire workflow, covering transforming anonymous drafts into public, presented papers. Key steps include de-anonymizing content while adhering to strict page limits, managing public artifact releases (code/data), designating presenters, and meeting critical deadlines for open-access proceedings.

This guide provides a rigorous, multi-gate audit checklist for submitting academic conference papers. It covers critical steps from adhering to strict deadlines and formatting rules (e.g., page limits, templates) to passing complex anonymity checks (double-blind review), and ensuring policy compliance (e.g., plagiarism, resubmission bans). Use this checklist before your final submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing the cyclical workflow for major academic conferences (e.g., NSDI). It helps research teams strategically plan multi-year projects, managing multiple submission gates (Spring/Fall), revisions, and long waiting periods. Essential for structuring research efforts and avoiding common pitfalls like double-submission or missed deadlines.

This skill provides a scholarly layer on top of standard Word document generation. It is designed to create highly formal academic papers (theses, journal articles, conference papers) adhering to strict style guides like APA, MLA, Chicago, and IEEE. Key features include managing complex citation styles, handling numbered equations, generating live cross-references (figures, tables), and implementing multi-column journal layouts.

This skill guide teaches how to use a CLI tool to programmatically create, modify, and validate complex Excel (.xlsx) files. It covers everything from building robust financial models and dashboards to parsing raw data and ensuring the output adheres to professional standards, including zero formula errors and proper print layouts. Ideal for data engineering and business intelligence workflows.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire lifecycle of submitting and revising academic papers for major conferences like OOPSLA. It details strategic decisions, such as choosing between October or March submission rounds, managing the state machine (Accept, Minor, Major Revision, Reject), budgeting time for necessary revisions, and planning post-publication artifacts and talks. Essential for academic research teams.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the Organization Science submission and review process. Learn about the decentralized senior-editor model, conflict-of-interest routing, double-blind preparation, and how to interpret complex decision letters (accept, reject, R&R). This resource is essential for authors preparing high-quality manuscripts for this top-tier academic venue.

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors preparing manuscripts for top academic journals. It guides users through crucial submission requirements, including double-blind anonymization, adherence to strict length norms (under 50 pages), structuring the contribution case, and ensuring compliance with modern transparency policies regarding data, code, and AI usage. Use it to maximize submission quality and minimize desk rejection risk.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of an Organization Science manuscript, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the correct next step and maintain coherence throughout the complex academic writing process.

This router provides a structured roadmap for developing a manuscript targeted at Organization Studies (OS). It guides users through the complex, multi-stage academic process, from initial theoretical concept selection and method design to data analysis and final rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and dictates the precise sequence of specialized theoretical and writing skills required to meet the high theoretical standards of OS.

A comprehensive guide detailing the necessary author response techniques for high-stakes academic conferences, particularly focusing on the shift from traditional rebuttals to structured, mandated revision cycles (shepherding). It covers pre-submission pre-mortems, managing mandated changes using a change matrix, and maintaining professional rigor throughout the review process. Ideal for PhD students and researchers.

A comprehensive guide for project-managing the demanding lifecycle of submitting a top-tier systems conference paper (e.g., OSDI). Covers critical deadlines, from initial title registration and full submission to artifact preparation and final paper revisions. It provides strategies for navigating review outcomes, retargeting to other venues (SOSP, NSDI), and utilizing the silent window for continuous improvement.