Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the cyclical workflow for major academic conferences (e.g., NSDI). It helps research teams strategically plan multi-year projects, managing multiple submission gates (Spring/Fall), revisions, and long waiting periods. Essential for structuring research efforts and avoiding common pitfalls like double-submission or missed deadlines.

This skill provides a scholarly layer on top of standard Word document generation. It is designed to create highly formal academic papers (theses, journal articles, conference papers) adhering to strict style guides like APA, MLA, Chicago, and IEEE. Key features include managing complex citation styles, handling numbered equations, generating live cross-references (figures, tables), and implementing multi-column journal layouts.

Create fillable Word documents (.docx) with content controls, legacy form fields, mail-merge placeholders, and document protection using OfficeCLI. Ideal for onboarding forms, surveys, contracts, and templates where only specific fields are editable.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the Organization Science submission and review process. Learn about the decentralized senior-editor model, conflict-of-interest routing, double-blind preparation, and how to interpret complex decision letters (accept, reject, R&R). This resource is essential for authors preparing high-quality manuscripts for this top-tier academic venue.

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors preparing manuscripts for top academic journals. It guides users through crucial submission requirements, including double-blind anonymization, adherence to strict length norms (under 50 pages), structuring the contribution case, and ensuring compliance with modern transparency policies regarding data, code, and AI usage. Use it to maximize submission quality and minimize desk rejection risk.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting academic research papers to major conferences like PerCom. Covers critical steps including adhering to IEEE formatting standards, managing the two-step registration and submission deadlines, ensuring double-blind anonymity (leak detection), and providing necessary open-data and institutional ethics documentation. Essential for ensuring submissions meet high academic publication standards.

This guide assists authors in determining if their literary or language-studies manuscript is suitable for PMLA, the flagship journal of the Modern Language Association. It covers general-interest argument framing, close reading expectations, MLA house style compliance, and best practices for scholarly engagement, helping authors re-frame highly specialized work for a broad academic audience.

This guide helps scholars assess whether their literary or language-studies project meets the broad, general-interest standards of PMLA. It provides a detailed "fit test" framework, ensuring the work focuses on a significant problem, maintains broad scholarly interest, and presents a sustained argument rather than a descriptive survey. Useful for framing academic essays or deciding between different publication venues.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for academic papers targeting conferences like PODS. It meticulously covers formatting requirements (e.g., acmsmall template, 15-page budget), strict double-anonymous review rules, conflict of interest declaration, and critical deadlines, ensuring submissions are ready for platforms like EasyChair.

A comprehensive checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for academic journal submission via platforms like ScholarOne Manuscripts. It guides users through essential compliance checks, including maintaining double-anonymity, adhering to free format requirements, and ensuring all required metadata (ORCID, data availability statement) is included, helping authors prevent common rejection reasons before actual submission.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for preparing submissions for top-tier academic conferences, such as POPL. This resource helps researchers adhere to strict formatting rules (e.g., 25-page limits, acmsmall), maintain full double-blind anonymity, prevent unintentional author identity leaks, and manage the complex workflow and deadlines for academic publishing.