Skill UI

This guide provides comprehensive standards for conducting and presenting experimental evidence in high-level communication journals (JOC). It emphasizes moving beyond simple results to ensure statistical rigor, reproducibility, and comprehensive coverage of physical layer, network, and security aspects, helping submissions withstand expert peer review.

This tool guides authors in assessing whether their fluid mechanics manuscript is a suitable fit for the Journal of Fluid Mechanics (JFM). It emphasizes the need for fundamental physical understanding (e.g., new scaling laws, instability mechanisms) over mere demonstration of applied methods or devices. It covers rigorous standards for computation, experimentation, and theoretical analysis, serving as a crucial pre-submission framing and venue-selection resource.

A specialized tool designed to assess the suitability and refine the structure of a manuscript targeting the Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IJEM). It helps authors understand the journal's specific scope, preferred methodologies (modeling, algorithms, simulation), structural requirements, and common rejection pitfalls, optimizing the paper before submission.

A comprehensive guide for microarchitecture researchers on achieving rigorous scientific reproducibility. It mandates tracking every critical artifact—including simulator commits, workload traces, power/area models, and RTL toolchains—and compiling them into a single run manifest, ensuring any reported result can be verified by a third party.

A comprehensive model detailing the entire academic review pipeline for microarchitecture papers, anchored to major conferences like MICRO. It outlines the timeline, from initial submission and double-blind review through the rebuttal/revision window, to final notification. The guide details what expert reviewers focus on—including mechanism novelty, methodology credibility, and cost honesty—providing authors with actionable strategies for strengthening their work through the academic publication lifecycle.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for achieving high reproducibility in Machine Learning Systems (MLSys) performance claims. It details how to rigorously control sources of non-determinism (e.g., thermal noise, random seeds) and pin the entire technical stack—from hardware and drivers to frameworks and serving policies—to ensure results can be validated by third parties.

This guide details the rigorous process for packaging research artifacts in mobile communications for academic evaluation committees (AEC). It emphasizes creating a hardware-optional path, defining claims (badges), and ensuring reproducibility through smoke runs, recorded replay paths, and permanent DOI-backed archiving, allowing evaluation even without specialized lab equipment.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices and an audit checklist for designing robust, real-world experiments in mobile and wireless communication systems. It emphasizes moving beyond simulations, detailing necessary RF setups, quantifiable energy metrics, and reporting statistical distributions to ensure high academic credibility.

A comprehensive guide to ensuring reproducibility in radio frequency (RF) physical layer measurements. It details the necessity of maintaining a detailed provenance ledger—recording radio hardware, channel conditions, mobility patterns, and software versions at the time of the run. The goal is not bit-identical results, but documenting variance and methodology so that findings can be validated on different testbeds or later in time, while also addressing legal and ethical data shipping constraints.

This comprehensive audit checklist guides authors through the final pre-upload steps for major academic conferences like MobiCom. It covers critical areas including HotCRP site confirmation, adherence to strict formatting rules (columns, page limits), maintaining double-blind anonymity, and mitigating wireless-specific identity leaks to ensure a smooth and compliant submission process.

This guide helps authors navigate the complex, multi-stage submission process for MobiCom. It emphasizes planning backward from the final paper cutoff, accounting for two distinct annual rounds, staggered review stages, and the critical impact of schedule slips on program editions. Essential for managing wireless and mobility research timelines.

A comprehensive guide for submitting research artifacts to the MobiSys Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC). It details the process for achieving three independent ACM badges (Available, Functional, Results Reproduced). Emphasis is placed on creating fully reproducible, script-first workflows, designing for hardware-optional environments, and maintaining strict anonymity during review.