Skill UI

This workflow guides the entire process of writing an authoritative, invited review article for the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc). It systematically routes the author through the academic lifecycle, covering stages from topic selection and systematic literature synthesis to imposing an organizing framework and final revision, ensuring the output is a comprehensive analytical map of a subfield.

This skill guides art historians on gathering, weighing, and citing non-visual, documentary, and material evidence for academic articles. It covers citing primary sources (archives, contracts), reconstructing provenance chains, interpreting technical reports, and ensuring that all scholarly claims are rigorously traceable to verifiable sources rather than mere assertion.

This guide provides a detailed architectural framework for writing long-form art-historical essays. It teaches writers how to structure their argument by leading with the core problem and thesis, integrating visual evidence (figures) exactly where the prose requires it, and maintaining strict discipline over word count and endnotes. Essential for transforming a rambling draft into a clear, scholarly argument.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodology of 'close looking' crucial for academic art writing, particularly for Art Bulletin articles. It teaches how to move beyond mere description by systematically analyzing composition, facture, medium, and scale. Every visual claim must be supported by reproducible evidence, such as numbered figures or detail crops, ensuring the argument is grounded in verifiable observation, not mere assertion.

This workflow router serves as the central orchestrator for academic articles submitted to art history journals. It guides authors through the complex, multi-stage publishing lifecycle, from initial topic selection and scholarly positioning to visual analysis, evidence gathering, and final submission. Crucially, it proactively manages the often-overlooked and time-consuming process of image rights and permissions, ensuring authors do not delay this critical step until the end.

This comprehensive guide details the strict academic formatting required for submitting art historical articles, particularly for journals adhering to The Chicago Manual of Style. It covers the use of CMOS endnotes (not footnotes), precise descriptive prose, and mandatory, structured formatting for captions, credit lines, and figure references.

This skill guides scholars in rigorously evaluating whether a sociology project or paper is suitable for the American Sociological Review (ASR). It focuses on testing the work's broad significance, theoretical payoff across subfields, and structural fit, distinguishing between full articles and focused comments/replies. Use this before significant research investment.

This tool serves as the primary orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Sociological Review (ASR). It guides users through the entire publication lifecycle, determining the optimal sub-skill based on the project's current stage, manuscript type (Article or Comment/Reply), and methodological approach (e.g., quantitative, ethnographic). It helps users confirm broad sociological significance and find the next critical step in the publishing process.

This tool serves as the central workflow router for manuscripts targeting the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It guides the user through the entire academic writing and submission lifecycle, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous data analysis, writing style refinement, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses the appropriate format (Article, Letter, Comment) and the next required skill stage, ensuring the research meets the journal's requirement for broad, general interest in political science.

This sophisticated tool is designed to polish scientific manuscripts for high-impact, rigorous journals. It guides users in structuring a mechanistic narrative, ensuring that every claim made in the text is precisely calibrated to the strength of the supporting experimental evidence (e.g., distinguishing correlation from necessity). It focuses on scientific storytelling, nomenclature consistency, and eliminating hype, transforming raw research data into a polished, scholarly article.

A comprehensive guide to restructuring scientific manuscripts from a collection of isolated findings into a single, compelling, and cohesive narrative arc. It forces the story into a Hypothesis → Mechanism → Significance structure, ensuring that every figure advances a central, airtight argument, crucial for top-tier journal submissions.

This guide provides a detailed framework for structuring top-tier scientific articles, specifically modeled after Cell Journal standards. It covers the proper flow from Summary to Discussion, emphasizing the use of descriptive subheadings in Results, adhering to STAR Methods instead of free-text methods, and maintaining strict length discipline. Ideal for researchers struggling with manuscript organization or reaching submission stage for high-impact journals.