Skill UI

This skill provides an authoritative guide for assessing whether a comprehensive review article is suitable for Chemical Reviews (Chem Rev). It details the journal's high standards, emphasizing that submissions must be exhaustive, critically analytical syntheses of the entire field, not primary experimental reports or progress updates. Use this tool to refine scope, structure, and evidence depth before submission, ensuring alignment with the journal's 'invited venue' status.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

A comprehensive skill designed for authors targeting Classical and Quantum Gravity (CQG). It guides users on the journal's specific scope, methodological rigor (including mathematical proofs, numerical analysis, and observational constraints), and appropriate academic framing for manuscripts in general relativity, cosmology, and quantum gravity. Use this to assess article suitability before submission.

This skill guides the rigorous polishing and structuring of social science academic manuscripts for top-tier journals. It ensures the writing adheres to the cumulative social science format (Theory $ ightarrow$ Hypotheses $ ightarrow$ Method $ ightarrow$ Results $ ightarrow$ Discussion), strictly follows APA style guidelines, and manages length constraints. It transforms raw drafts into publishable, theoretically advanced academic articles.

This guide helps authors rigorously assess whether their scientific research meets the high standards of *Conservation Biology*. It provides a framework to test if a study is novel, transferable, and directly relevant to global biodiversity conservation decisions, moving beyond simple local descriptions. It helps structure the scope, choose the appropriate article type, and frame the core conservation problem.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to Conservation Biology. It guides authors through the entire scientific writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Essay, Contributed Paper) and the necessary sequence of sub-skills (from study design to data analysis and relevance checks). It ensures the final work has direct, transferable implications for the conservation of biological diversity.

This guide details the critical, multi-step process for converting an accepted, anonymous conference manuscript into a publishable, citable journal article for PACMNET. Key tasks include systematic de-anonymization (restoring author details and system names), completing comprehensive journal metadata (ACM CCS, ORCID, licensing), permanent linking of artifacts via DOI, and conducting rigorous production checks to ensure final publication quality.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test the academic fit of their project for top-tier criminology journals. It guides authors on moving beyond descriptive data analysis to achieve general theoretical contributions, differentiating between Articles and Research Notes, and ensuring the work advances core debates in the field of crime and deviance.

A comprehensive playbook for academic authors detailing the two distinct tasks of responding to journal feedback. It differentiates between the private, pre-acceptance revise-and-resubmit letter (R&R) and the public, scholarly CA✩ Reply published alongside the article. It guides authors on strategic rebuttal, synthesizing themes, maintaining academic integrity, and ethically managing sources.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical steps before submitting an academic manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal. It covers mandatory technical requirements, such as correctly separating figures (TIFF/EPS) from text (.doc/.rtf), adhering to specific style guides (e.g., Chicago author-date), confirming article type word counts, and addressing critical ethical statements and copyright assignments. Essential for ensuring smooth submission via platforms like Editorial Manager.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for developing and submitting manuscripts to Current Anthropology (CA). It guides authors through the entire academic lifecycle, helping them determine the correct article type (Major Article, Report, Forum, etc.), appropriate subfield, and the necessary current stage (e.g., theory building, data analysis, ethics review). It ensures submissions are robust enough to withstand the rigorous CA✩ commentary and reply process.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and polishing academic manuscripts intended for Current Anthropology (CA) publication. It ensures the article is highly readable by a global, non-specialist audience, minimizes technical jargon, and adheres strictly to CA's house style (Chicago author-date, strict word caps for Major Articles/Reports, and abstract length). Ideal for final revisions, structuring arguments, and achieving maximum scholarly impact.