Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-caliber academic journals like Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It ensures compliance with critical publishing standards, covering abstract length limits (≤250 words), mandatory conference-version disclosures, generative AI declarations, and correct formatting (LaTeX/Word elsarticle). Use this checklist before submitting to Editorial Manager to minimize rejection risks.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire publication lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final revision. It determines the correct stage, appropriate format (Research Article, Perspective), and routes the user to the necessary sub-skill, ensuring that the work maintains a strong focus on human and policy dimensions, rather than solely environmental results.

A comprehensive guide for planning the submission of law-review articles, detailing the multi-submit and expedite mechanics used by top law students. It covers strategic timing (Spring vs. Fall seasons), establishing a tiered submission set (Reach, Match, Floor), and leveraging offers to accelerate review at highly ranked journals like HLR. Essential for maximizing publication chances in competitive academic environments.

This skill audits the accuracy and academic rigor of legal citations, particularly for law review articles following The Bluebook style. It ensures proper authority hierarchy (primary vs. secondary), correct use of pinpoint citations, and proper signal usage (e.g., See, Cf., But see). It is essential for academic legal writing to ensure submissions meet the highest standards of scholarly rigor.

A comprehensive guide detailing the final pre-submission checks for scholarly articles targeting the Harvard Law Review (HLR). This checklist ensures adherence to rigorous standards, including Bluebook 22nd edition citation formatting, proper anonymization, strict word count limitations, and navigating HLR's specific submission portal.

This guide provides structured criteria for selecting high-quality, publishable topics for academic law review submissions, such as the Harvard Law Review. It emphasizes that successful topics must possess broad legal significance, be timely (linked to recent legal developments), and contain a clear normative argument, moving beyond mere descriptive surveys.

This guide acts as the orchestrator for submitting scholarly articles to Harvard Law Review (HLR). It maps the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of legal academic writing, guiding users through every step from initial topic selection and preemption checks to argument structure, rigorous Bluebook citation, and final student-editor review. It is essential for understanding the unique, student-edited model and required submission strategy in legal academia.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and polishing scholarly review articles for a broad academic audience. It ensures the writing adopts an authoritative, highly accessible, and forward-looking narrative arc, guiding the author to move beyond mere summary and establish a clear research agenda.

This skill acts as a workflow router for writing academic papers for the journal 'China Rural Economy'. It does not replace specialized skills but guides the user through the entire manuscript process—from topic formulation and literature review to causal identification, mechanism testing, and handling reviewer comments (R&R). It ensures the structural and methodological completeness of the research article.

This guide provides comprehensive style guidelines for submitting articles to the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It specifically instructs authors on converting traditional footnote-based citations to the required in-text author-date system. Key areas covered include formatting the alphabetized, year-keyed reference list, handling primary-source texts, and adhering to house conventions like italicizing foreign words.

This comprehensive guide outlines the strategic approach for authors revising an academic article following a 'revise-and-resubmit' (R&R) decision. It teaches how to synthesize conflicting feedback from diverse reviewers (e.g., textual scholars, theorists, ethnographers), ensuring every comment is addressed point-by-point. The goal is to strengthen the argument while protecting the core field significance and maintaining scholarly anonymity.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for structuring advanced humanities essays, particularly for major academic journals. It emphasizes building a clear, thesis-driven argument that unfolds naturally, avoiding rigid IMRaD formats. Use it when outlining, restructuring confusing drafts, or needing to ensure the argument's significance remains visible throughout the body.