Skill UI

A comprehensive, canonical workflow for defining, writing, and improving complex AI skills. It guides users through a structured, multi-step process, including resolving targets, synthesizing information, enforcing depth gates, authoring artifacts, optimizing descriptions, and conducting thorough evaluation and validation.

Prepares and validates research-only clinical decision-support evaluation, evidence-profile, cohort, survival, biomarker/model, privacy, and governance artifacts using aggregate or synthetic data. Not for patient care or live clinical use.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for packaging multiagent system (MARL) and game theory evidence for academic submissions, particularly for conferences like AAMAS. It emphasizes that the artifact must be inspectable, containing not just a trained model, but the game definition, environment code, opponent sets, and interaction protocols, ensuring rigorous reproducibility and reviewability.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting papers to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It details how to organize and present anonymous, reproducible code, data, and experimental artifacts to enhance the credibility and rigor of research in control, automation, and pattern recognition, supporting the double-blind review process.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting evidence packages (artifacts) for NLP research papers, such as code, datasets, prompts, and model outputs. It details requirements for reproducibility, adhering to the Responsible NLP checklist, ensuring proper anonymization, and preparing for post-acceptance public release in academic settings like ACL.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research artifacts (code, models, datasets, media) for ACM Multimedia conferences. It details the distinct requirements for anonymous review packages versus permanent public releases, offering guidelines on ethics, licensing, reproducibility, and track-specific documentation.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to package all necessary supplementary evidence for academic submissions in AI, statistics, and machine learning domains. It covers best practices for ensuring reproducibility, including managing proofs, simulation scripts, benchmark data, random seeds, and minimizing metadata risks for reviewers.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic research tools and data into highly polished, reproducible, and reusable packages for the ASE Artifact Evaluation track. Learn how to meet the criteria for earning 'Artifacts Available' (DOI archiving) and 'Artifacts Reusable' badges, ensuring your work is durable and accessible to the wider research community.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing an artifact appendix (ae.tex) for major conferences like ASPLOS. Learn how to structure your submission to achieve Available, Functional, and Reproducible badges. Covers managing complex dependencies (hardware, software, data), structuring the repository for evaluators, and optimizing collaboration protocols to ensure successful post-acceptance validation.

This guide details the rigorous process for packaging research artifacts for submission to major conferences like USENIX ATC. It outlines the requirements for earning three key badges—Artifacts Available, Functional, and Reproduced—ensuring that submitted work is reproducible, functional, and permanently archived according to industry best practices.