Skill UI

This guide details the crucial rules for structuring a scientific paper submitted to conferences like ITCS. It dictates how content—including main theorems, proofs, and motivation—must be distributed across three locations: the main body, the submitted appendix, and the external full version (arXiv). The core principle ensures that all decision-critical evidence for accepting the paper resides within the submitted PDF, preventing reviewers from relying on external or unread preprints.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for structuring advanced humanities essays, particularly for major academic journals. It emphasizes building a clear, thesis-driven argument that unfolds naturally, avoiding rigid IMRaD formats. Use it when outlining, restructuring confusing drafts, or needing to ensure the argument's significance remains visible throughout the body.

A comprehensive guide detailing best practices for creating self-contained, professional, and publication-ready exhibits (tables, figures, matrices) for scholarly manuscripts. It emphasizes making the body text standalone, adhering to journal-specific styles (e.g., APA, JAIS), and presenting complex data (like SEM results) clearly for rigorous peer review.

A guide on how to effectively position academic manuscripts, particularly for highly interdisciplinary journals like JCR. This technique emphasizes moving beyond 'gap-spotting' (stating what hasn't been studied) and instead focusing on 'problematization'—questioning fundamental assumptions within the existing body of consumer research literature. It teaches how to build a clear, multi-disciplinary conversation and defend the work's unique contribution against neighboring venues.

A guide on how to present highly convincing empirical evidence in academic writing, especially in economics, when regression tables or complex math are limited. This skill teaches readers to translate statistical findings into clear, impactful prose by focusing on magnitude in plain units, synthesizing the body of evidence, defining ranges of precision, and maintaining intellectual honesty.

This guide details how to properly structure an Internet Appendix for academic manuscripts, particularly tailored for the Journal of Financial Economics (JFE). It instructs authors on separating exhaustive proofs, secondary robustness tests, detailed derivations, and supplementary results from the main body text. Mastering this skill ensures the manuscript maintains high scientific rigor while remaining highly readable and adhering to specific journal formatting standards.

This guide helps researchers adhere to the strict submission guidelines of the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It details how to manage and optimize the presentation of empirical evidence, ensuring the manuscript stays within the combined limit of 10 tables and figures, and under the 40-page length cap. It guides the decision of which exhibits belong in the main body versus the online supplementary appendix.

This guide provides critical structuring advice for authors submitting ML Systems papers, focusing on the strategic division of content between the mandatory 10-page body and the unlimited supplementary appendix. It outlines which material belongs in the main text (claims that must be believed) versus what belongs in the appendix (material that must be verifiable evidence, such as full hyperparameter grids or deep ablations).

This guide provides essential best practices for structuring technical academic papers, especially when facing strict page limits (like a 12-page cap). It teaches authors how to properly divide content into the core body (main results, mechanism) and supplementary appendices (derivations, full protocols). The goal is to make the contribution self-contained while maximizing clarity and impact for reviewers.

This guide provides detailed instructions for authors submitting supplementary material for conferences like MobiSys. It helps authors categorize content—distinguishing between core material (must be in the main body), supporting evidence (appendix), demonstration media, and runnable artifacts—while strictly adhering to double-blind and page-limit constraints. The goal is to ensure the main paper is self-contained and fully judgeable.

This guide instructs authors on how to strategically position their research manuscript within the established body of Operations Management (OM) literature. Instead of claiming an unstudied 'void,' the focus is on joining and advancing specific 'operational conversations' within canonical OM streams (e.g., queueing, supply chain, revenue management). It emphasizes differentiating contributions based on novel operational mechanisms or decision levers, ensuring the paper's fit is clear to expert reviewers and editors.

This guide helps authors structure highly technical security papers, especially for venues with strict page limits like NDSS. It details how to allocate content across the main body, ethics considerations, and appendices, ensuring the core decision-making arguments remain self-contained and maximally persuasive to reviewers by passing the 'dependency test'.