Skill UI

This skill provides a detailed framework for researchers to determine the most suitable venue (e.g., RSS, ICRA, CoRL, IROS) for their robotics project paper. It teaches how to shift focus from merely demonstrating a system's capabilities to articulating a precise, testable scientific claim, ensuring the work is optimally presented to the target academic community.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management framework for submitting research to major robotics conferences, particularly RSS. It maps out the complex annual cycle, from abstract submission to final presentation, detailing critical deadlines, required milestones (like hardware trials and writing drafts), and fallback options at sibling venues (IROS, CoRL, ICRA). Essential for researchers managing time-sensitive academic pipelines.

A comprehensive guide for technical writers revising manuscripts for top-tier robotics venues. It emphasizes shifting the paper's focus from system demonstrations to a primary, falsifiable scientific claim. Learn to structure your argument, size evidence to the claim scope, pre-answer reviewer critiques, maintain extreme concision, and report failures with scientific rigor.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals like Science. It doesn't write the content but guides the user through essential stages—from initial significance testing to final submission and rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill needed, ensuring the manuscript meets high standards for general interest and structure.

This skill provides a detailed guide to the requirements and positioning of Science Robotics (Sci Robot), an AAAS journal. It helps authors determine if their robotics research meets the high bar for broad scientific or societal significance. Key areas covered include demonstrated real-world capability, required quantification of physical performance, AAAS submission structure, and best practices for venue selection, making it essential for authors targeting top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors to determine if their manuscript meets the stringent standards of Science Translational Medicine. This skill assesses the necessary dual mandate: demonstrating both a solid mechanistic insight and a credible, measurable clinical translation arc (drug, device, or biomarker). It covers scope fit, required human evidence standards, necessary preclinical validation, and specific structural requirements for submission.

This guide details the comprehensive steps required after an ACM conference paper has been accepted. It covers critical stages including obtaining shepherd approval, de-anonymizing the work (restoring author names, funding, and system details), reflowing the paper using the acmart template, and submitting both the source code and the final PDF through the ACM Publishing System (TAPS). It emphasizes releasing public artifacts for reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors on how to sharpen and frame their research contributions for top-tier strategy journals. It teaches authors to move beyond simply listing findings, focusing instead on articulating a genuine theoretical advance, defining the 'so what' for both strategy scholars and practitioners, and maintaining consistency across the manuscript (Introduction, Theory, Discussion).

A comprehensive guide for drafting the critical author response (rebuttal) for the SoCC conference. Since there is no major revision round, this single, high-stakes turn must persuasively address concerns from both systems and data/measurement reviewers. It emphasizes correcting factual errors, supplying missing numbers (like tail latency and cost), and maintaining strict dual anonymity.

A comprehensive guide for positioning a paper for ACM SoCC. It instructs authors to write the related work section by bridging both systems literature (e.g., OSDI, NSDI) and data-management literature (e.g., SIGMOD, VLDB). Focus must be on stating the 'delta'—the unique difference—rather than merely listing citations, ensuring dual anonymity and covering all relevant technical lanes.

This guide details the rigorous academic review process for ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC) submissions. It explains the dual-anonymous, two-round review structure, the importance of incorporating both systems performance and data measurement rigor (including tail latency and cost), and how the rebuttal period functions. Essential reading for authors aiming to publish in top-tier cloud computing venues.

A comprehensive guide for preparing the data, code, and materials transparency posture when submitting a manuscript to Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It clarifies the journal's guidelines (encouraged, not required) regarding data sharing, covering both quantitative and qualitative research methods while strictly adhering to ethical considerations and ASA norms.