Skill UI

Scan entire codebases or specific changes, audit repositories for security issues, and generate verified patch files. Supports scanning whole repositories, branch diffs, or individual commits. Each finding is verified by an agent panel before reporting. Suggested patches are saved as files for manual review and application. Works in auto mode for streamlined security auditing workflows.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for packaging multiagent system (MARL) and game theory evidence for academic submissions, particularly for conferences like AAMAS. It emphasizes that the artifact must be inspectable, containing not just a trained model, but the game definition, environment code, opponent sets, and interaction protocols, ensuring rigorous reproducibility and reviewability.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting papers to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It details how to organize and present anonymous, reproducible code, data, and experimental artifacts to enhance the credibility and rigor of research in control, automation, and pattern recognition, supporting the double-blind review process.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research artifacts (code, models, datasets, media) for ACM Multimedia conferences. It details the distinct requirements for anonymous review packages versus permanent public releases, offering guidelines on ethics, licensing, reproducibility, and track-specific documentation.

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

A comprehensive guide for assembling a fully reproducible research package for macroeconomics papers targeting the American Economic Journal (AEJ: Macro). It ensures compliance with the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy by documenting raw data, simulation/calibration code, estimation routines, and visualization steps, guaranteeing that results can be independently verified by reviewers.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) via the AEA system. It ensures compliance with single-blind review policies, covering abstract word limits, JEL coding, data/code availability requirements, formatting, and fee confirmation before final submission.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final necessary checks before submitting a manuscript to AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA system. It ensures strict compliance with single-blind review rules, JEL code requirements, formatting standards, data availability statements, and disclosure policies, significantly improving the likelihood of a successful submission.

This guide outlines the comprehensive package structure required for submitting manuscripts to American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights). It ensures authors meet the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy, providing all necessary code, raw data access, and documentation (including a master script and exhibit-to-code map) to allow the data editor to verify the reproducibility of every result before publication. It is crucial for passing the final publication gate.

A comprehensive final pre-submission checklist for American Economic Review: Insights. This guide ensures your manuscript meets strict journal requirements, including word count limitations (main text and exhibits), abstract length, author metadata, and adherence to the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Use this before submitting to avoid auto-return gates.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for preparing supplementary materials for major academic conferences like AISTATS. It details the proper structure and handling of appendices, mathematical proofs, code archives, and additional data tables, ensuring that the main paper remains fully understandable even if the supplementary material is ignored by reviewers. Essential for publishing high-quality, robust research.