Skill UI

This skill serves as a comprehensive router for managing the entire lifecycle of an ICML manuscript. It guides users through every phase, including topic selection, drafting, artifact preparation, OpenReview submission, double-blind review, author response, and final camera-ready publication. It helps track risks, evidence, and official conference policies.

This comprehensive guide teaches researchers how to structure and refine machine learning papers for top-tier conferences like ICML. It focuses on achieving clarity, soundness, originality, and significance within strict page limits, providing actionable strategies to ensure the research withstands rigorous reviewer scrutiny.

This guide provides a structured methodology for handling reviewer comments across various academic publishing channels, including camera-ready revisions, formal journal response letters, and resubmission memos. It teaches researchers how to move beyond simple rebuttal by focusing on technical honesty, evidence-based arguments, and disciplined revision processes required by top conferences (ICRA/IROS) and journals (RA-L).

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the 'Related Work' section for top-tier robotics conferences like ICRA. It details how to conduct thorough literature reviews across multiple research 'lanes,' handle concurrent work (arXiv), properly self-cite under double-anonymous rules, and position the novelty against both academic rivals and commercial systems.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the ICRA conference paper review process. Details the unique pipeline, from submission through the CEB review board, highlighting key structural differences from journal reviews. Special attention is paid to the absence of an author rebuttal phase, advising authors on strategies like anticipating objections, using video evidence, and maximizing clarity to improve acceptance chances.

A comprehensive style guide for structuring and refining robotics research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like ICRA. It dictates moving from technique-speak to task-first narratives, emphasizing figure-first presentation, rigorous quantification of claims, and adhering to strict page budgets to maximize reviewer impact and clarity.

This guide details the rigorous process of preparing research artifacts for formal evaluation at major academic conferences like ICSE. It covers achieving ACM badges (Available, Reusable, Reproduced/Replicated) by ensuring proper DOI archiving, open licensing, robust documentation, and verifiable reproducibility for external reviewers, transforming raw research into publishable, trustworthy assets.

A comprehensive guide for structuring author responses to major academic conference reviews (e.g., ICSE). It distinguishes between the initial 'author response' and the structured 'Major Revision' letter. Learn how to address specific review criteria (Novelty, Rigor, Relevance, Verifiability) using a technical, neutral 'ledger' format, ensuring every claim is evidence-based and professionally presented.

This comprehensive guide details the entire ICSE conference paper review lifecycle, from initial submission to final decision. It analyzes the four core scoring criteria—Novelty, Rigor, Relevance, and Verifiability—and maps out the Accept/Major Revision/Reject decision model. Use this to strategically plan your revisions and understand the academic publishing landscape.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major academic conferences (e.g., ICSE). It details the strict rules for differentiating mandatory core content (the 10-page limit) from supporting evidence, such as extended proofs, scripts, and raw data, which must be placed in an anonymized supplementary package. Learn the 'summarize-and-point' discipline to ensure verifiability and maintain reviewer trust.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

A comprehensive post-acceptance checklist detailing the rigorous steps needed to transform an accepted research paper into the final camera-ready version for IEEE Xplore publication. This includes de-anonymization, adherence to the IEEEtran format, completing metadata and rights forms, integrating reviewer feedback faithfully, and permanentizing data availability links for open science.