Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC). This skill helps assess whether a computer vision manuscript fits the venue, providing expert advice on framing, necessary evidence gaps, structural improvements, and differentiating the work from related CV conferences (e.g., CVPR, ICCV). It ensures the contribution is clear and highly specialized for specialist reviewers.

This guide models the complex and rigorous two-stage filtering process for submissions to the CAV conference. It details the partial double-anonymity, the core evaluation criteria (significance, soundness, novelty), and provides strategic advice on how authors should structure their paper to withstand early rejection, and how to use the rebuttal phase effectively.

Use this comprehensive guide to manage the entire project lifecycle for a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper submission. It provides a backward-planning timeline, covering topics from initial concept fitting and evidence locking to the two-stage review process, optional artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission. Essential for managing technical academic deadlines and mitigating common failure modes.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal response for major academic conferences (like CCS). It teaches strategic communication, focusing on triaging decision-critical issues (threat model, ethics, novelty), structuring arguments by conceding strong points, anchoring claims to existing evidence, and avoiding over-promising. Essential for authors facing adversarial review patterns.

A comprehensive guide for authors planning research submissions to top-tier academic security conferences like CCS. It details the two-cycle HotCRP workflow, decision criteria, and strategic advice on addressing threat model soundness, novelty, evidence quality, and crucial ethical disclosure concerns across all stages, from initial review to minor revision.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, multi-stage peer review pipeline used by major academic conferences (like ACM CHI). It breaks down the roles of the 1AC, 2AC, and external reviewers, explaining screening mechanisms like Desk Reject (DR) and Assisted Desk Reject (ADR). It covers the entire journey from initial recommendations to the final PC meeting, providing authors with a framework to interpret feedback and strategically revise their work.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strict requirements for submitting supplementary materials (video figures, code archives, data, and appendices) to major academic conferences like CHI. It emphasizes critical rules such as end-to-end anonymity, self-containment (the paper must stand alone), proper data archiving, and handling multiple submission stages (review vs. publication).

This guide teaches authors how to strategically position their human-computer interaction (HCI) research for top-tier conferences like CHI. It covers identifying the core contribution type (e.g., theory, empirical study, system artifact), determining the most suitable venue (e.g., UIST, CSCW, DIS), and selecting the appropriate reviewing subcommittees to maximize acceptance chances and impact.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end lifecycle for submitting a paper to the ACM CHI conference. It maps out critical milestones, including the initial submission deadline, the two-round review process, the crucial five-week revision window, camera-ready submission, and final publication. The guide also includes risk management strategies and fallback venues for rejected submissions, ensuring authors are prepared for every stage.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers for the ACM CHI conference. It provides detailed instructions on structuring explicit contribution statements, calibrating claims, ethically handling participant quotes, and ensuring accessibility for mixed-expertise review juries. Essential for those submitting research in HCI and related fields.