Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (TMI). It details the journal's specific scope, required technical rigor, necessary validation standards, and structure, emphasizing that contributions must be medical-imaging-specific rather than generic computer vision methods. This tool helps authors assess fit, re-frame their work, and anticipate submission requirements.

This skill guides authors on submitting power conversion manuscripts to IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (TPEL). It evaluates the manuscript's fit by checking for the required balance between theoretical novelty and rigorous experimental validation, covering topics like converter topologies, control methods, and wide-bandgap devices. Use it when evaluating a paper's suitability for TPEL or re-framing a design from a single build to a generalizable, highly benchmarked contribution.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the suitability of their electric power system manuscripts for leading journals like IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (TPWRS). It details the required 'system-level methodological contribution' standard, emphasizing validation through credible case studies, adherence to standard test systems, and positioning the work within core power system domains (e.g., stability, optimal power flow, renewables integration).

This guide helps authors determine if their robotics research is suitable for IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO). It focuses on establishing the necessary rigor, emphasizing that contributions must be complete and rigorously validated, preferably demonstrated on real robots or high-fidelity simulation platforms. It covers scope, experimental validation standards, and manuscript structure.

This guide provides a structured methodology for positioning academic research manuscripts, particularly for top-tier journals like the International Economic Review (IER). It teaches authors how to articulate a novel contribution (the 'delta') by defining the current academic frontier, identifying consequential gaps, and demonstrating how their work is both methodologically rigorous and generally applicable, thus justifying its placement against competing publications.

A comprehensive guide for quantitative economists to assess if a research topic meets the 'rigor and generality' standards of the International Economic Review (IER). It helps users determine the scope of their contribution, matching it against archetypes like pure theory, structural macro, econometrics, and causal micro, ensuring the work has broad appeal beyond a specific field.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting to major AI conferences. It helps authors audit originality, properly cite prior art (including preprints, workshop papers, and rejected versions), manage dual-submission risks, and transform the related work section from a mere list into a compelling, novel argument that clearly positions the contribution.

A comprehensive framework for researchers to assess if their AI research contribution is best suited for a major conference like IJCAI, or if a highly specialized venue (such as NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, or ACL) would provide a clearer audience. It guides decisions based on technical depth, problem scope, and contribution type.

This skill guides authors in refining the core computational or methodological claim of a technical manuscript, especially for journals like IJOC. It teaches how to move beyond merely describing an application and instead rigorously defining what is computationally new, by how much, and against which baseline. It structures the primary contribution sentence to be precise, falsifiable, and method-focused.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to position their computational or methodological contributions when submitting to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It emphasizes the critical need to advance against two distinct frontiers simultaneously: the Operations Research/Mathematical Science problem domain, and the core computing methodology. Use this when reviewer feedback questions the novelty or when your work straddles OR and CS boundaries.

This router guides authors through the entire academic workflow for submissions to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It structures the process from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and rebuttal phase, ensuring the computational contribution is the central focus. It helps authors maintain flow and address the specific demands of the OR/CS intersection.

This guide provides detailed standards for structuring and writing manuscripts submitted to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It mandates a precise, methods-forward, and quantitative voice, ensuring the paper is accessible to both Operations Research (OR) and Computer Science (CS) audiences. Key elements covered include abstract structure (≤300 words, no formulas), rapid contribution framing in the introduction, and using numbered pseudocode for methods.