Skill UI

This guide teaches how to transition from a general literature survey to a precise, high-impact staking of position, particularly for top-tier finance journals like RoF. It emphasizes identifying the 3-6 closest frontier papers, clearly articulating the 'delta' (what your paper adds), and bridging the gap between empirical evidence and theoretical mechanisms. Mastery of this skill is crucial for surviving rigorous academic peer review.

This router guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of preparing a manuscript for a top-tier finance journal like the Review of Finance (RoF). It diagnoses current bottlenecks—whether related to contribution framing, data analysis, or rebuttal strategy—and systematically recommends the next specialized skill to ensure a complete and high-quality submission.

This skill guides authors through the complex process of selecting the optimal academic journal venue for their research. It profiles the paper's characteristics (discipline, method, contribution) and shortlists potential targets from a large index. It scores candidates based on fit, acceptance odds, turnaround time, and audience, providing a tiered recommendation (Reach, Match, Safe) and a detailed resubmission ladder. Ideal for rejected drafts or papers needing a first target.

This comprehensive guide outlines the strict criteria for submitting a paper to the SenSys conference after the 2026 merger. It clarifies that the core contribution must be a built, measured sensing or embedded system, demonstrating value based on physical resources like energy, memory, and latency on real hardware, rather than being a pure algorithm or networking mechanism.

A guide on how to position a research contribution for general social science journals. It emphasizes moving beyond simple literature reviews to actively engaging a live academic debate. Users learn how to connect niche findings to broader social science implications while maintaining scholarly rigor and adhering to strict word and citation limits.

This skill guides the transformation of empirical findings into generalizable, theoretically robust arguments suitable for top-tier social science publishing. It helps define core social mechanisms, establish scope conditions, and derive testable observable implications across diverse methodologies (e.g., quantitative, comparative, network). Use this when your initial results are strong but the overarching theoretical contribution needs explicit articulation.

This skill guides researchers on assessing if their academic project fits the scope and standards of a major social science journal. It provides a rigorous framework to test for general significance, methodological credibility, theoretical contribution, and adherence to strict word limits, helping authors effectively frame their work for a broad academic audience.

This specialized skill guides authors through the rigorous academic requirements for submitting manuscripts to the Shanghai Journal of Economics. It helps users assess whether their work aligns with the journal's focus areas—such as urban governance, industrial transformation, and the Yangtze River Delta economy—and provides heuristics for structuring, framing, and enhancing the manuscript's academic contribution.

This skill guides authors on strategically positioning data mining research for the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). It helps adjust manuscript framing, emphasizing mathematical rigor, statistical depth, and algorithmic contribution suitable for top Computer Science venues. Use it for venue selection, understanding reviewer expectations, and structuring evidence to meet the high standards of SIAM-style research.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting highly rigorous theoretical computer science manuscripts to top-tier venues like SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP). It covers required standards for algorithmic design, computational complexity, formal proofs, house style, and the high bar for theoretical contribution necessary for foundational academic publishing.

A guide to navigating the rigorous academic publication pipeline, detailing stages such as early rejection, rebuttal, one-shot revision, and shepherding. It helps authors understand reviewer focus areas (e.g., evaluation realism, contribution) and plan strategic responses to maximize acceptance chances in top-tier venues.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding if their networking contribution (mechanism, architecture, or protocol) is a strong fit for SIGCOMM. It provides criteria for distinguishing between research novelty and real-world experience, and routes the work to similar top venues like NSDI, MobiCom, and IMC based on the core technical signal.