Skill UI

Provides paragraph-level structural blueprints and venue-specific checklists for 10–12 page systems conference submissions (OSDI/SOSP/ASPLOS/NSDI/EuroSys), covering writing patterns, reviewer guidance, LaTeX templates, and deadline tracking.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting systems papers to the EuroSys conference. It helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript, frame the narrative, and determine the required evidence depth (including implementation artifacts and realistic workloads). The guide specifically covers European systems research in OS, distributed systems, cloud, and security, while providing comparisons to related top-tier venues like SOSP and OSDI.

This guide details how to prepare high-quality, verifiable system artifacts (code, data, hardware) for academic conferences like EuroSys. It outlines the requirements for achieving multiple evaluation badges—Available, Functional, and Reproduced—by ensuring the artifact is self-contained, portable, and verifiable by an external evaluator without prior context.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps for converting an accepted EuroSys paper into the final ACM proceedings format. It covers complex template changes, mandatory metadata completion (eRights, ORCID), artifact linking, and ensuring absolute coherence between the final PDF and the ACM Digital Library record. Essential reading for authors preparing for final submission compliance.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for designing rigorous, falsifiable system evaluations for academic research papers. It details best practices across four critical evidence layers: end-to-end performance, mechanism decomposition, operational cost, and boundary testing. Learn how to ensure workload realism, maintain baseline fairness, structure your experiment matrix, and avoid common pitfalls to meet top-tier systems research standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to position novelty within top-tier systems literature (like EuroSys, SOSP, OSDI). It teaches authors to move beyond superficial citations by defining concrete 'technical deltas,' systematically covering neighboring research venues, and structuring the argument based on problem dimensions rather than chronology. Essential for ensuring rigorous academic positioning.

A comprehensive framework for ensuring rigorous scientific reproducibility in systems papers. It details how to establish a full provenance ledger (tracking hardware, software commits, and workloads), manage performance variance through repeated runs and statistical reporting, and implement automated pipelines so that all reported figures can be regenerated from raw data.

This guide meticulously models the rigorous decision-making machinery of top-tier academic conferences, using EuroSys as a detailed example. It covers the two-round submission cycle, the 'Accept/Revise/Reject' outcome logic, double-blind review mechanics, and critical criteria (like deployment plausibility and verifiable fairness) that determine a paper's success. Ideal for researchers and graduate students preparing systems research submissions.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and submit highly technical papers to major academic conferences (e.g., EuroSys). It outlines the 'four shelves'—the 12-page core argument, references, artifact repositories, and appendices—ensuring that the main, decision-critical evidence is always contained within the primary reviewed pages, preventing the submission from failing due to overflow.

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether their computer systems project—covering areas like OS, distributed infrastructure, cloud computing, and ML systems—is best suited for EuroSys, or if it should target other top-tier venues like SOSP, OSDI, or ASPLOS. It provides rigorous criteria covering built artifacts, transferable ideas, evidence quality, and strategic timing to maximize publication chances.