Skill UI

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the NeurIPS academic workflow. It guides users through every stage of preparing a machine learning manuscript, from initial topic and track selection to writing, mandatory paper checklist completion, OpenReview submission, handling the double-blind review process, and finalizing the camera-ready version. It helps ensure the manuscript is robust, evidence-backed, and adheres to all conference policies.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of an Organization Science manuscript, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the correct next step and maintain coherence throughout the complex academic writing process.

This router provides a structured roadmap for developing a manuscript targeted at Organization Studies (OS). It guides users through the complex, multi-stage academic process, from initial theoretical concept selection and method design to data analysis and final rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and dictates the precise sequence of specialized theoretical and writing skills required to meet the high theoretical standards of OS.

A comprehensive guide detailing the necessary author response techniques for high-stakes academic conferences, particularly focusing on the shift from traditional rebuttals to structured, mandated revision cycles (shepherding). It covers pre-submission pre-mortems, managing mandated changes using a change matrix, and maintaining professional rigor throughout the review process. Ideal for PhD students and researchers.

This guide provides a detailed model of the PerCom conference review process, covering double-blind review, the three-TPC-member evaluation model, the early-rejection gate, and the bounded rebuttal stage. It clarifies how authors should structure their submissions to succeed in this single-round, non-revisionary academic environment, differentiating it sharply from journal cycles.

This skill guides advanced academic writers through the process of 'synthesis,' moving beyond mere summary in literature reviews. It teaches how to take multiple, seemingly disparate sources and synthesize them into a single, cumulative, and powerful central argument (the 'synthetic spine'). This is crucial for scholarly work, ensuring the contribution is a novel argument, not just a comprehensive list of what others have found.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.

This guide details the meticulous process of converting an accepted PLDI conference paper into a formal PACMPL journal article. It covers crucial steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details, ORCIDs), adopting journal formatting standards, handling digital artifacts on Zenodo, managing open-access rights, and coordinating the three distinct deliverables: the article, the artifact, and the presentation talk.

A comprehensive guide detailing the entire academic review lifecycle for top-tier programming language conferences like PLDI. It covers every critical stage, from initial submission and double-blind review through author responses, final acceptance criteria, and post-publication artifact evaluation. Learn what Program Chairs look for, how to address soundness doubts, and how to optimize your paper for maximum impact.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising an academic essay after receiving multiple substantive reader reports and an Editorial Board decision, specifically for PMLA submissions. It outlines strategies for addressing every reader comment, reconciling conflicts openly, protecting the core argument, and maintaining academic anonymity throughout the revision process.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the complex process of submitting manuscripts to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). It covers journal positioning, scope fit (from natural to social sciences), required evidence standards, house style rules (like the Significance Statement), and a detailed pre-submission checklist to ensure manuscripts meet high academic publication standards.

This router guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of preparing a manuscript for publication in PNAS. It maps the necessary sequence of specialized skills, covering initial significance assessment, determining submission tracks (Direct vs. Contributed), crafting the Significance Statement, structuring the paper, and managing the revision/rebuttal cycle.