Skill UI

This tool guides researchers through the entire process of preparing a manuscript for submission to the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It acts as a structured router, diagnosing bottlenecks and recommending the next specialized skill (e.g., identification, empirical design, rebuttal) needed at each stage, from topic selection to final revision.

This guide details the specific, rigorous peer-review process for the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It covers crucial elements such as single-blind anonymity, the distinct "up or out" single-revision rule, the ~50% publication likelihood threshold for R&R, and best practices for preparing suggested referees. Use it when you need to set realistic expectations for journal submissions or strategically interpret complex review decisions.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript lifecycle. It guides authors through the entire process, from topic selection and theoretical development to data analysis, contribution framing, and handling review rebuttals. It ensures the manuscript meets JMR's stringent 'dual bar' (methodological rigor and substantive contribution) by identifying the correct next specialized step.

This router guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage process of drafting and refining a manuscript for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It diagnoses bottlenecks, providing a comprehensive, sequential path from topic selection and theoretical development to methods, data analysis, writing, and revision/rebuttal, ensuring the work meets high academic publishing standards.

This structured workflow guide is designed for researchers submitting to top-tier management science journals. It acts as a comprehensive router, guiding the manuscript through the rigorous academic process: from problem definition and model construction, through theoretical proofs, algorithm analysis, and numerical validation, ensuring methodological depth over mere empirical findings.

This workflow orchestrates the entire manuscript submission process for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP). It guides authors by ensuring the paper addresses two critical standards: a theoretical contribution to I-O science, and high rigor in design and measurement. It routes users through specific stages—from topic selection and theory development to study design, data analysis, and revision.

This guide provides a comprehensive, step-by-step walkthrough of the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) submission and review lifecycle. It covers the single-anonymized review structure, the crucial initial editor screening process, and details the three submission tracks (Regular, Annals, Themed). It also outlines the rigorous methodological criteria expected from modern econometric submissions, including the required elements for the initial editorial packet.

This router guides authors through the entire process of preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE). It does not replace specialized skills but serves as a diagnostic tool, telling the user which specific jole-* skill to invoke next based on the current writing bottleneck, from initial topic selection through to rebuttal and final submission.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for submitting empirical research to the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It guides researchers through every stage of the manuscript lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theory development to rigorous data analysis, contribution framing, and point-by-point rebuttal. It does not replace specialized skills but diagnoses the current bottleneck and suggests the appropriate next step in the submission process.

A comprehensive guide for responding to peer reviews and compiling revision manuscripts for high-impact academic journals, specifically tailored for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It teaches authors how to structure closed-loop responses (Opinion—Response—Location), maintain a professional tone, provide verifiable evidence, and systematically address complex or conflicting critiques throughout the multi-round publication process.

This guide models the three-stage review process for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It helps authors understand the initial screening (format, relevance, plagiarism), expert peer review, and final committee review. By predicting potential outcomes and identifying strategic 'levers' at each stage, users can effectively revise manuscripts, manage submission timelines, and significantly increase the chances of successful publication in communication, networking, or information security fields.

This skill guides political science scholars through the rigorous process of assessing whether their research project meets the high standards of top-tier journals (e.g., The Journal of Politics). It focuses on evaluating the work for general interest, theoretical innovation, methodological diversity, and appropriate scope (Research Article vs. Short Article) to maximize publication chances.