Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for polishing sophisticated academic manuscripts, particularly those in Information Systems Research (ISR). This skill helps ensure the contribution is front-loaded, the structure is clear for diverse disciplinary audiences (behavioral, economic, design-science), and the formatting adheres to strict academic standards (e.g., INFORMS author-date style, abstract length limits). Ideal for late-stage editing passes before submission.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for ensuring that figures and tables in medical manuscripts comply with the rigorous reporting standards of JAMA. It covers mandatory elements such as CONSORT flow diagrams, reporting effect sizes with 95% CIs, structuring baseline characteristics, and avoiding statistical misrepresentation (e.g., using p-values instead of CIs).

A guide for researchers on determining if their macro or finance paper has a load-bearing international or open-economy dimension. It provides specific tests and reframing techniques to ensure the core contribution is cross-border, preventing misrouted submissions to top academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal or response to peer reviews for major academic conferences. It details how to maximize impact by focusing exclusively on correcting factual proof misreadings, supplying missing lemmas, and clarifying technical bounds, while strictly avoiding arguments of significance or taste. Emphasizes maintaining anonymity and adherence to the double-blind format.

This guide provides a structured framework for writing author responses to reviewers in top-tier academic conferences (like POPL). It teaches authors how to triage complex feedback into categories such as soundness doubts, formalism misreadings, and significance gaps. The goal is to create a concise, highly targeted rebuttal that removes doubts and strengthens the paper's case for conditional acceptance without introducing new material.

This guide details the strategic process for writing a constrained, data-driven rebuttal for competitive academic conferences (such as PPoPP). It teaches authors how to structure responses to address scaling questions, compare results against baselines, correct factual misreadings, and maximize impact within strict word and time limits. Focus on evidence, not argument.

A comprehensive guide to structuring and drafting rebuttal responses for top-tier academic conferences like SODA. This process teaches authors how to efficiently address referee concerns within a strict time limit, distinguishing between genuine flaws and simple misreadings. It emphasizes evidence anchoring, maintaining anonymity, and adhering to strict submission rules to maximize impact during the short response window.

This guide teaches authors how to structure and write a concise, evidence-based response during the academic rebuttal window (e.g., TACAS). It focuses on correcting factual misreadings, proving algorithm soundness, addressing evaluation fairness, and providing verifiable evidence, rather than rewriting the paper. It emphasizes brevity and targeted argumentation.

A comprehensive framework for authorized security assessments of Operational Technology (OT) and Industrial Control Systems (ICS). It emphasizes a 'passive-first' approach, covering Purdue model zoning, analyzing industrial protocols (Modbus, DNP3, etc.), and identifying exposure points on SCADA/DCS environments. The methodology strictly avoids disruptive write operations on PLCs, prioritizing read-only validation and safe network analysis for physical safety.

Drafts formal pre-action letters (Letter Before Claim) for civil claims in England & Wales, correctly applying the relevant pre-action protocol—debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction. Surfaces limitation deadlines for solicitor confirmation and highlights costs and Part 36 consequences. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms.

This skill establishes a rigorous, verification-first methodology for citing jurisprudence from the ICTY, ICTR, and IRMCT. It mandates multi-level checks (existence, content, paragraph) against authoritative databases (irmct.org, UCR) and sources to ensure legal claims are accurate and non-misrepresentative. It guides users through a structured workflow for high-stakes legal research.

JurisRank is a computational tool that analyzes citation networks of Argentine Supreme Court (CSJN) jurisprudence using a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay. It measures the jurisprudential authority of legal precedents, allowing users to rank competing cases by influence, trace the evolution of legal doctrine, and detect potential constitutional drift. Ideal for intensive legal research, due diligence, and academic analysis of legal trends in Argentina.