Skill UI

This skill is a comprehensive strategic guide for authors targeting the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). It helps assess the fit of a manuscript, guides the re-framing of work from journal or arXiv styles into a specialized conference narrative, and outlines specific requirements for evidence, evaluation (including offline metrics, user context, and leakage-aware methods), and contribution framing necessary for top-tier CS venues.

This skill provides comprehensive strategic guidance for authors targeting the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). It helps authors assess manuscript fit, re-frame research from journal or arXiv styles, and strengthen evidence by focusing on digital library contributions (metadata, preservation, access). Use it when preparing a detailed submission strategy for this specialized CS venue.

This skill guides authors on positioning their research for the ACM International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI). It functions as a venue-selection and re-framing tool, helping authors structure manuscripts (moving from general CS/journal style to a specialized tangible interaction narrative). It covers scope fit, evidence requirements, and distinguishing TEI from similar HCI conferences.

Provides a comprehensive framework for authors submitting to UbiComp (Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing). This guide helps authors assess manuscript suitability, guides the re-framing of work from journal or arXiv formats, and outlines the necessary evidence (e.g., deployed sensing data, field validation) required by this specialized, top-tier venue. Essential for advanced conference submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for computer science authors targeting high-performance parallel and distributed computing venues like HPDC. It assists in conference fit evaluation, manuscript re-framing (from journal/arXiv to conference narrative), identifying evidence gaps, and structuring contributions for optimal review success in cloud/HPC systems and distributed settings. Ideal for determining submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS). This skill helps determine manuscript fit, provides strategies for re-framing work from other disciplines (e.g., journal or arXiv style), and details the required evidence (e.g., community-grounded framing, ethical evaluation) needed to succeed in this specialized venue. Use it for venue selection, scope calibration, and submission readiness checks for accessible technology research.

This skill guides authors and researchers on how to strategically position their computer graphics, rendering, or visual computing work for the ACM SIGGRAPH conference. It covers core fit assessment, required evidence (visual, mathematical, or system), manuscript reframing from journal/arXiv styles, and navigating venue-specific submission requirements. Use this tool to improve your conference submission strategy and maximize visibility among top graphics reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting data mining papers to the ACM SIGKDD Conference. It helps authors assess the manuscript's fit, reframe the contribution (e.g., from journal to conference style), and strengthens the evidence bar by focusing on novelty, scale, reproducibility, and clear real-world impact required by top-tier data science venues.

This skill guides authors on positioning their programming language research for the PLDI conference. It covers scope fit, required evidence (formal semantics, implementation insights), structural recommendations, and necessary framing changes (e.g., from journal to conference style) to maximize acceptance chances at this flagship venue.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine the academic positioning of their manuscripts. It differentiates between core accounting issues (e.g., disclosure quality, audit standards, earnings management) and corporate finance mechanisms (e.g., pricing, funding constraints). Use this tool to ensure your paper aligns perfectly with the scope of specialized academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for writing and verifying the institutional and accounting standard background section in academic manuscripts. This tool emphasizes the critical need for precision, requiring accurate standard names, official document numbers (文号), effective dates, and applicable scopes. Essential for empirical studies relying on regulatory changes, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards of authoritative accounting journals.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure a high-impact literature review for top-tier academic journals. It moves beyond merely summarizing recent empirical studies, focusing instead on establishing a deep theoretical lineage (e.g., earnings quality, audit theory), identifying specific, non-obvious research gaps, and clearly positioning the current study's unique contribution within the established academic discourse.