Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for standardizing the presentation of findings in academic manuscripts, particularly for social science and public administration journals. It covers strict formatting rules for quantitative regression tables (three-line style, max 6 columns), variable definition sheets, qualitative data coding tables, and process/mechanism diagrams, ensuring methodological rigor and compliance with high publication standards.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing self-contained, comparative, and publication-ready tables and figures for Comparative Political Studies (CPS) manuscripts. It emphasizes transforming raw statistical results into visually compelling exhibits that clearly communicate the cross-case or over-time comparative argument, while adhering to professional journal standards (e.g., grayscale legibility, vector output).

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.

This guide helps authors structure, refine, and polish academic manuscripts for Comparative Political Studies (CPS) journals. It ensures the prose is tightly focused, the argument is stated clearly from the start, and the paper adheres to the specific house formatting (e.g., 11,000-word limit, unstructured abstract, APA style). It improves readability and structure without altering the core analysis.

This guide provides rigorous methodology and theoretical frameworks for conducting heterogeneity analysis, particularly for academic manuscripts focused on rural Chinese economies. It outlines criteria for dimension selection (e.g., household endowment, regional environment, policy timing), ensuring theoretical justification, and setting minimum sample size requirements to avoid superficial findings and common pitfalls.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in drafting high-quality, structured literature reviews for top-tier academic journals in rural economics, such as China Rural Economy. It emphasizes shifting from a simple 'listing' format to a nuanced, 'dialogue-based' scholarly discussion. Key areas covered include balancing Chinese and international literature, establishing theoretical frameworks, and clearly articulating the manuscript's unique academic contribution and gap.

A comprehensive style guide designed for academic manuscripts, particularly those targeting journals like China Rural Economy. This skill helps authors eliminate vague academic jargon, replace generic policy language (e.g., 'strengthen, improve, promote'), and ground abstract concepts in observable household mechanisms. It ensures precise narrative structure, enhancing the rigor and impact of the research findings.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed, step-by-step checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for high-level academic journals, specifically modeled after the requirements of China Rural Economy. It covers all critical stages, including formatting standards, double-blinding rules, reference citation completeness, and rigorous empirical data verification, ensuring submissions meet professional scholarly standards.

A comprehensive guide for creating rigorous, self-contained, and scientifically accurate tables and figures for academic manuscripts, particularly in the field of criminology. It details best practices for visualizing complex statistical results, including age-crime curves, trajectory plots, survival analyses, and spatial hot-spot maps. The focus is on ensuring evidence is clear, reproducible, and communicates the research findings effectively to expert reviewers.

This skill is designed to polish academic manuscripts in the field of Criminology for interdisciplinary publication. It ensures the writing adheres to APA-based style, adopts person-first language, and structures the narrative to clearly articulate the theoretical contribution, research mechanism, and overall significance for a broad academic audience.

This guide provides expert advice on crafting the "Related Work" section for academic submissions, particularly those targeting CSCW. It details how to successfully integrate four distinct literatures (CSCW lineage, PACMHCI work, neighboring venues, and source disciplines), ensuring citations are era-correct, arguments are contestable, and the review process is navigated rigorously.

This guide details best practices for enhancing the credibility of academic manuscripts submitted to scholarly journals, particularly addressing code and data availability. It teaches authors how to proactively provide stable links, checksums, comprehensive reproducibility scripts, and clear licensing statements. The focus is on bolstering trustworthiness for single-blind review processes, even when the journal does not mandate formal artifact badges.