Skill UI

This guide outlines the critical rules for structuring technical research papers submitted to top-tier conferences like ASE. It emphasizes the 'decision-criticality' rule, instructing authors on how to separate core arguments (which must fit within the 10-page body) from reproduction details, raw logs, and supplementary material (the artifact). Mastering this separation is crucial for ensuring reviewers judge the paper on its merits, not its supplementary data.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit machine learning manuscripts to the Asian Conference on Machine Learning (ACML). This skill helps evaluate manuscript fit, re-frame research from journal or arXiv styles, understand required contribution types (e.g., algorithms, theorems, benchmarks), and align the paper's evidence bar with the expectations of a top-tier, regional AI/ML venue. Use it for venue selection and submission strategy development.

This skill guides scholars in rigorously evaluating whether a sociology project or paper is suitable for the American Sociological Review (ASR). It focuses on testing the work's broad significance, theoretical payoff across subfields, and structural fit, distinguishing between full articles and focused comments/replies. Use this before significant research investment.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing related work sections for top-tier systems conferences (e.g., ATC). It teaches how to accurately position a new system relative to existing literature, emphasizing delta-first comparisons, covering adjacent subareas, and adhering to strict double-blind citation protocols. Essential for academic rigor in systems research.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine the optimal venue for their computer systems paper. It teaches the critical differences between broad, practical conferences (like ATC) and selective, specialized venues (like OSDI, SOSP, or NSDI). The guide helps authors assess whether their work is novel, useful, focused on deployed experience, or requires specific networking/storage expertise.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

This skill guides authors through the unique requirements of submitting macro-policy research to venues like Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA). It serves as a comprehensive fit-check, covering journal positioning, evidence bar, required framing, and the conference/solicited submission workflow. Use it to re-frame academic work to meet the standards of real-time policy relevance and clear policy implication.

This guide helps authors strategically position their research within active academic debates, particularly in accounting. It ensures the contribution advances a live accounting conversation, clearly distinguishes the work from related finance or economics papers, and adheres to necessary disclosure rules regarding the authors' own concurrent publications. It transforms a manuscript from merely reporting findings into actively joining and advancing a scholarly dialogue.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps for authors preparing accepted papers for camera-ready publication in the Springer LNCS open-access format. It details the process of de-anonymizing the manuscript, completing essential Springer metadata (ORCID, author order), integrating reviewer feedback, and making all research artifacts permanent using DOIs. Following this checklist is crucial for successful publication.

This comprehensive audit guide helps authors prepare their research papers for the CAV submission portal. It covers crucial steps including selecting the correct paper category (Regular, Short Tool, etc.), adhering to LNCS formatting and page limits, and performing technical double-blind anonymity sweeps. Use this checklist to mitigate risks like identity leaks and filing errors before the final deadline.

This guide helps researchers strategically determine the best academic venue (e.g., CAV, TACAS, FMCAD) and paper category (Regular, Tool, Application, Industrial) for their formal methods research. It provides detailed criteria for classifying contributions based on guaranteed techniques, usable tools, or real-world case studies, ensuring maximum impact and fit for the target conference.

This guide details the structure and best practices for preparing supplementary appendices for security conference papers, particularly following the ACM CCS guidelines. It covers organizing formal proofs, ethics considerations, extended measurements, and ensuring double-blind anonymity, ensuring the main body remains clear while supporting complex research.