Skill UI

PIP kicks in when tasks fail repeatedly or the assistant becomes passive, layering Western big-tech performance rhetoric, a systematic debugging methodology, and proactivity enforcement so every code, ops, research, deployment, or writing task is owned, verified, and driven to completion.

This tool provides comprehensive, late-stage polish for full-manuscript academic prose, specifically tailored for top-tier journals (e.g., AMJ). It focuses on transforming dense, jargon-heavy text into rigorous yet highly readable narratives. Key functions include front-loading the core argument, enforcing active voice, refining structural flow (Introduction to Discussion arc), ensuring consistent terminology, and adhering strictly to required academic house styles and formatting standards. It improves clarity and rhetorical impact without altering the theoretical contribution or data analy...

This skill guide teaches the specialized rhetorical and structural requirements for writing comprehensive academic reviews, particularly for high-impact fields like Sociology. It ensures the prose is authoritative, highly accessible to non-specialists, logically signposted, and culminates in a concrete, forward-looking research agenda, moving beyond simple summary.

This skill guides the architectural structure and rhetorical flow of a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay. Instead of following traditional IMRaD formats, it focuses on shaping the narrative arc: how to hook a non-specialist reader, build intellectual pressure, make a clear intervention (the turn), and conclude with expansive new questions. Ideal for long-form humanistic prose that needs to guide a cross-field audience through complex arguments.

This skill guide teaches how to polish complex academic prose for high-level journals, focusing on achieving an ambitious, lucid, and precise writing style. It emphasizes tightening style and discipline—ensuring clarity, maintaining a controlled academic voice, and adhering strictly to word limits (e.g., 9,500 words). It is designed to elevate the text's rhetorical quality without inventing new arguments or evidence.

A comprehensive guide detailing the structural and rhetorical requirements for submitting networking systems papers to CoNEXT. It emphasizes leading with the problem context, tying every claim to real-world measurements, acknowledging limitations proactively, and adhering to strict academic formatting standards (acmart).

This skill guides authors in refining academic manuscripts for top-tier finance and economics journals. It focuses on eliminating empty rhetoric, replacing vague policy jargon, structuring arguments with clear topic sentences, and ensuring methodological and economic interpretations are precise, actionable, and grounded in observable mechanisms.

This comprehensive guide polishes academic manuscripts for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on refining rhetoric by eliminating vague, empty-significance phrases and improving policy recommendations. The skill helps authors transition from mere statistical reporting to articulating clear economic implications, ensuring consistency in tense, person, and terminology.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing rebuttal letters when responding to major revisions (R&R) for top-tier academic journals. It teaches how to transform reviewer concerns into new empirical studies, structure point-by-point responses, and professionally argue a mechanism using evidence rather than rhetoric.

This skill guides authors on positioning and framing manuscripts for the Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING). It provides detailed advice on core fit, required evidence (e.g., documentation, licensing, annotation reliability), and rhetorical structure needed to ensure a paper resonates with the specialized audience of language resources and computational linguistics.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for drafting a professional and persuasive response letter to academic journal reviewers following a major or minor revision (R&R). It details the precise structure, from addressing the editor to point-by-point rebuttals, emphasizing how to tackle core concerns like endogeneity and theoretical contribution with evidence, not just rhetoric.

A comprehensive guide for authors on allocating limited space within academic conference papers. It details the 'three-container model' (main body, references, appendix) and provides rules for maximizing rhetorical impact while adhering to strict page limits, ensuring evidence is placed correctly for reviewers.