Skill UI

This comprehensive guide serves as the final pre-submission checklist for authors submitting to The Art Bulletin. It details critical requirements for maintaining double-blind anonymity, proper file structure, and adherence to specific academic constraints, including word counts, citation styles (Chicago), and image handling. It ensures submissions are in the required Microsoft Word format, preventing common rejection triggers.

This comprehensive guide details the strict academic formatting required for submitting art historical articles, particularly for journals adhering to The Chicago Manual of Style. It covers the use of CMOS endnotes (not footnotes), precise descriptive prose, and mandatory, structured formatting for captions, credit lines, and figure references.

This comprehensive guide helps computer vision researchers strategically position their work for the Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV). It covers how to evaluate manuscript fit, restructure the narrative from general to conference-specific, optimize evidence presentation (including ablations and failure modes), and understand ACCV's regional niche compared to global flagships like CVPR or ECCV.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing an artifact appendix (ae.tex) for major conferences like ASPLOS. Learn how to structure your submission to achieve Available, Functional, and Reproducible badges. Covers managing complex dependencies (hardware, software, data), structuring the repository for evaluators, and optimizing collaboration protocols to ensure successful post-acceptance validation.

This guide provides a tactical framework for drafting high-stakes author responses (rebuttals) to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences. It details how to triage reviewer comments (factual errors, questions, disputes), structure the argument within strict word limits (e.g., 800 words), and maintain a professional, evidence-based tone to maximize the paper's chances of acceptance or major revision.

A comprehensive guide detailing the staged peer review pipeline for top-tier academic conferences. It analyzes stages from rapid screening to major revisions, providing actionable strategies for authors to maximize leverage, address reviewer concerns, and structure rebuttal responses effectively.

This guide helps researchers structure and articulate the core theoretical contribution of their academic manuscripts, particularly for high-standard journals like ASQ. It teaches the critical difference between simply reporting findings and making a fundamental theoretical advancement. Learn how to frame contributions using mechanisms, reframing, boundary conditions, and integration, optimizing your Introduction and Discussion sections to maximize impact.

This skill guides users in elevating empirical findings from diverse sociological methods (quantitative, ethnographic, historical, etc.) into a generalizable, portable theoretical argument. It provides a structured framework to define core mechanisms, concepts, scope conditions, and observable implications, ensuring the contribution meets the rigorous standards of top-tier academic journals by proving its transferability beyond a single case or subfield.

This skill guides the polishing of academic manuscripts for high-level sociology journals like ASR. It ensures the writing is readable by a general sociologist outside the subfield, adheres strictly to the ASA Style Guide, and manages strict word caps (e.g., 15,000 words total, 200-word abstract). It focuses on clarity, structure, and adherence to formatting rules rather than generating new content.

This guide provides a detailed methodology for crafting formal academic responses after conference reviews (e.g., ATC). It distinguishes between the concise, evidence-based rebuttal—used to correct factual misreadings or supply missing measurements—and the structured description of changes, which serves as a point-by-point contract proving all required revisions were implemented. The core principles emphasize precision, supporting claims with concrete evidence, and maintaining academic anonymity.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

This guide details the specific structure and rigor required for writing systems papers for top-tier academic conferences like ATC. It emphasizes the need for a self-standing, two-page abstract (Round One) and a full-paper narrative that is purely implementation and measurement driven. Key principles include quantifying costs alongside gains, structuring the narrative from problem to impact, and rigorously supporting claims with real-world evidence.