Skill UI

This skill guides users on structuring and polishing scholarly abstracts and keywords for high-impact academic journals. It emphasizes moving beyond mere background description by adopting a 'Problem → Proposition → Support → Significance' structure, ensuring the core contribution is presented first to maximize academic impact and international visibility.

A comprehensive guide for advanced academic writing, focusing on transforming mere literature summaries into structured theoretical dialogues. It teaches authors how to establish the historical lineage of a field, identify core scholarly disputes, and strategically position their own research within an ongoing, sophisticated academic conversation, moving beyond simple empirical citation lists.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to external academic reviews (rebuttal) for top-tier journals. It outlines the precise structure, professional strategy, and tone required to defend propositions, deepen theoretical dialogue, and systematically revise a manuscript point-by-point, ensuring the response is rigorous and highly professional.

This guide provides a structured framework for academics to elevate their research topics. It instructs authors on transforming narrow empirical questions into major theoretical and institutional debates, connecting research to core societal issues (China, World, Era). It emphasizes moving beyond simple policy assessment to address structural contradictions and theoretical gaps, suitable for advanced academic writing.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to SCI journals, detailing best practices for making research code and data available. It addresses how to proactively provide reproducible materials, structured documentation, and honest availability statements, even when formal 'Artifact Evaluation' badges are not mandatory. It helps authors improve the robustness and impact of their scientific findings.

This comprehensive guide details the professional process for authors responding to external peer review feedback and preparing a revised manuscript. It teaches how to structure a detailed, point-by-point response, effectively address critiques using data and evidence, differentiate between accepted, clarified, and retained points, and maintain the utmost academic etiquette during the revision cycle.

This guide outlines the essential principles for structuring scientific manuscripts submitted to academic journals. It details how to correctly allocate core evidence, lengthy proofs, additional experiments, and multimedia content across the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasized is that all evidence crucial for judging the paper's scientific contribution must reside within the main body text.

This guide clarifies the role of computation in theoretical computer science submissions, particularly for venues that prioritize theorems over empirical data. It distinguishes between legitimate forms of evidence—such as certified proof steps, constructive object discoveries, and illustrative examples—and inappropriate performance benchmarking. It helps researchers structure their work to align with theorem-based research, ensuring computational elements enhance the core theoretical contribution.

A comprehensive model detailing the rigorous evaluation process for submissions to STOC (Symposium on Theory of Computing). It covers the committee structure, the roles of program committee members and external subreviewers, the key evaluation axes (Correctness, Significance, Breadth, Novelty), the typical timeline, and strategic advice for authors on maximizing their leverage throughout the double-blind review process.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the scope and general significance of their theoretical computer science work. It introduces the 'breadth test' (corridor, lineage, technique) and a detailed routing map to advise whether the paper is best suited for a flagship, broad-scope venue like STOC, or a more specialized conference (e.g., SODA, ITCS, CCC). It provides a structured decision procedure for optimizing academic publication success.

This comprehensive guide details the specific structural and stylistic requirements for submitting high-quality theoretical computer science papers to top-tier conferences like STOC. It addresses how to frame the initial theorem statement, structure the technical overview, maintain notation economy, and effectively budget the limited page space to ensure maximum academic rigor and readability for diverse expert audiences.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit manuscripts to 'Studies in Science of Science.' It details the journal's focus areas, such as science metrics, knowledge networks, and technology policy, emphasizing the need for deep theoretical and methodological contributions. The skill helps authors optimize structure, avoid common rejection traps, and ensure adherence to academic publishing standards.