Skill UI

A comprehensive workflow router designed to guide researchers through the entire process of preparing manuscripts for top-tier business journals, such as the Nankai Business Review. This guide does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured, stage-gated approach covering theory gap identification, hypothesis development, rigorous measurement validation (e.g., SEM, validity), contextualization, and strategic revision (R&R). It ensures that the paper meets the necessary standards for theoretical contribution and empirical depth.

A comprehensive guide on structuring research papers for top-tier AI conferences (like NeurIPS). It teaches authors how to strategically allocate contributions, proofs, data details, and code artifacts across the main body, text appendices, and separate ZIP files. Use this skill to ensure reviewers can easily identify the core contribution and assess the work's validity without missing crucial supporting details.

This framework guides researchers in transforming platform-specific findings into abstract, portable concepts or functional mechanisms. It moves beyond mere correlation by helping define the scope, definition, and underlying process (mechanism) of a digital-media phenomenon, making the argument applicable to different contexts and technologies.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors aiming to submit manuscripts to Nature Geoscience. It details how to comply with strict journal limits on word count, display items, and references. By implementing a triage order—such as moving protocols to Online Methods and extended data to Supplementary Information—authors can ensure the main text remains focused, concise, and impactful.

This guide outlines best practices for Nature Geoscience authors, detailing how to separate essential narrative (Main Text) from comprehensive, reproducible documentation (Online Methods). It emphasizes grounding every quantitative claim, quantifying uncertainty, and ensuring full data and code availability to meet high academic standards and pass rigorous peer review.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to Nature Geoscience. It details the critical distinction between the main article text, online Methods, and Supplementary Information (SI). Learn how to ensure your core findings are stand-alone and decisive, while relegating extensive datasets, model ensembles, and derivations to the SI, maintaining academic rigor and clarity.

A comprehensive CLI skill for managing PowerPoint presentations (.pptx). This tool allows users to create, read, parse, edit, split, or combine slide decks programmatically. Beyond basic file manipulation, it enforces professional design standards, ensuring every output deck adheres to best practices regarding text hierarchy, visual components, and content density, making it ideal for automated report generation and pitch deck creation.

Resolve free-text scientific labels to ontology IDs and validate existing CURIEs using EBI OLS4, Bioregistry, and Identifiers.org. Supports annotating biological fields like tissue, disease, and phenotype. Ensures metadata accuracy for submissions to GEO, ENA, and BioSamples by checking obsolescence and prefix correctness.

This operator skill provides comprehensive control over the OpenViking context engine, enabling agents to manage long-term memory, session archives, and external resources within OpenClaw. It facilitates semantic recall, context querying, resource import, and recall trace debugging by communicating with a remote OpenViking server. Use this plugin when your agent requires advanced, persistent context management.

This tool polishes academic prose for Operations Research (OR) manuscripts, ensuring adherence to strict house styles like INFORMS. It enforces critical rules such as an equation-free introduction, a text-only abstract under 200 words, and clear theorem-proof exposition. Use this when your draft is complete and needs to meet the rigorous standards of an OR publication.

This skill polishes academic review essays to match the authoritative, argument-forward voice required by top-tier journals (e.g., PiHG). It ensures the prose advances a central thesis rather than summarizing literature. Key functions include enforcing journal format constraints (e.g., SAGE Harvard referencing, short unstructured abstract), adhering to word count caps, and transforming descriptive text into a critical, synthetic intervention.

This function guides academic writers in transforming rich textual readings into a consequential, field-shaping argument suitable for major scholarly publications (like PMLA). It moves beyond mere description by structuring the core elements: a contestable thesis, the interpretive warrant, the critical move, and the broad implications (stakes) for the discipline. Use this when your reading has deep potential but lacks a clear, governing, and consequential claim.