Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for ML research groups planning multi-venue conference submissions (e.g., COLM). It details the critical path of academic publishing, emphasizing backward induction from hard deadlines (abstract, paper, rebuttal, decision). The workflow covers compute budget allocation, co-author coordination, claim tracking, and managing the technical pipeline from initial topic selection to final presentation, ensuring reproducibility and timely execution in fast-paced AI research cycles.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the final, camera-ready version of a CVPR accepted paper. It details the multi-channel publication requirements (CVF open access, IEEE Xplore), the necessary steps for de-anonymization, ensuring timely dataset release, optimizing presentation formats (Oral, Poster), and conducting rigorous quality assurance checks before final submission.

This skill guides researchers on how to position an economic policy manuscript's contribution against two critical frontiers: the existing academic literature and the current, live policy debate (e.g., central bank statements, commission proposals). It teaches authors to synthesize a single contribution sentence that moves both the academic and the policy conversation, ensuring the paper is timely, impactful, and highly relevant to policymakers.

This comprehensive guide details the specific, commissioned submission process for the Economic Policy journal. It serves as a crucial preflight checklist for authors, covering all necessary stages: from developing a timely policy pitch and creating a conference-ready draft, to preparing the final camera-ready version. It is vital for authors to understand that EP operates via an invitation system and does not accept open submissions.

This comprehensive guide walks authors through the rigorous, post-acceptance editing process typical of top-tier scholarly journals, such as Harvard Law Review. It covers key stages: defending substantive arguments, enforcing technical style (Bluebook), and performing the critical source-pull/cite-check, ensuring every citation is verifiable. It focuses on collaborative relationship management and timely execution.

This guide provides structured criteria for selecting high-quality, publishable topics for academic law review submissions, such as the Harvard Law Review. It emphasizes that successful topics must possess broad legal significance, be timely (linked to recent legal developments), and contain a clear normative argument, moving beyond mere descriptive surveys.

A comprehensive audit checklist for submitting a paper to the HPCA conference. This guide covers critical checkpoints including the two-step abstract-and-conflict registration, adherence to the IEEE template (11-page limit), maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring full author listing in references, and disclosing AI-generated content. Use this to mitigate desk-reject risks and ensure timely submission readiness.

This comprehensive guide outlines the full project management lifecycle for submitting research papers to the ICASSP conference (IEEE Signal Processing Society). It details the annual timeline, critical milestones, backward planning heuristics, and best practices across various submission tracks to ensure timely and successful publication.

A comprehensive project management guide designed for managing high-stakes scientific conference submissions (e.g., INTERSPEECH). It maps the rigorous annual cycle, from initial drafting and submission deadlines to camera-ready production and final conference presentation. The guide outlines specific milestones, roles, risk patterns, and backward planning techniques to ensure timely and high-quality project completion.

A comprehensive guide for planning and executing a scientific paper submission for the ISSTA conference. It maps out all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, submission deadlines, major revisions, and artifact evaluation. The skill provides backward planning heuristics and identifies common failure modes to ensure timely and successful publication.

A comprehensive guide for academics to determine if a research topic is suitable for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It teaches authors to shift focus from presenting a narrow, new result (primary research) to synthesizing a broad, timely, and accessible understanding for a non-specialist audience, assessing criteria like breadth of interest, timeliness, and synthesizability.

This guide provides detailed instructions on writing the policy implications section for manuscripts submitted to quantitative journals (like JQTE). It emphasizes grounding all policy recommendations in the paper's specific quantitative findings (measurement, forecasting, or decomposition results), ensuring the advice is actionable, timely, and relevant to planning, industry, and technology decisions.