Skill UI

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in determining the suitability of their manuscript for Nucleic Acids Research (NAR). It details the journal's scope, structural demands, and rigorous standards for submissions involving DNA, RNA, bioinformatics, databases, or web tools. Use this to assess the fit and required elements before official submission.

This skill provides a scholarly layer on top of standard Word document generation. It is designed to create highly formal academic papers (theses, journal articles, conference papers) adhering to strict style guides like APA, MLA, Chicago, and IEEE. Key features include managing complex citation styles, handling numbered equations, generating live cross-references (figures, tables), and implementing multi-column journal layouts.

This skill guide teaches how to use a CLI tool to programmatically create, modify, and validate complex Excel (.xlsx) files. It covers everything from building robust financial models and dashboards to parsing raw data and ensuring the output adheres to professional standards, including zero formula errors and proper print layouts. Ideal for data engineering and business intelligence workflows.

This guide is a comprehensive tool for assessing the suitability of academic manuscripts for high-impact journals like Organization Science. It details the journal's scope, methodological expectations (including computational, qualitative, and experimental rigor), and the requirement for a clear, cross-disciplinary theoretical contribution. It helps authors refine their work, re-frame their arguments, and select the optimal academic venue before submission.

This tool helps authors determine the suitability of their academic manuscript for the highly theoretical journal, Organization Studies (OS). It guides authors on required depth, theoretical contribution (process, institutional, critical), qualitative methods, and European organizational theory framing, ensuring alignment with the journal's high academic bar and academic discourse.

A comprehensive checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to academic journals, specifically modeled after the requirements for Organization Studies (OS). It covers critical steps such as ensuring proper double-anonymization, adhering to strict word limits (e.g., 13,000 words), formatting guidelines (SAGE Harvard), and structuring abstracts and keywords. This tool ensures the manuscript is submission-ready before the final upload.

This tool polishes academic prose for Operations Research (OR) manuscripts, ensuring adherence to strict house styles like INFORMS. It enforces critical rules such as an equation-free introduction, a text-only abstract under 200 words, and clear theorem-proof exposition. Use this when your draft is complete and needs to meet the rigorous standards of an OR publication.

This tool guides the accurate invocation of the `ov skills` command group for managing the entire skill lifecycle on OpenViking. It supports adding skills from local directories, Git repositories, or GitHub URLs, and provides commands for listing, searching, updating, removing, and validating skill formats. Use it when an agent needs to automate skill deployment or discover available capabilities.

A comprehensive guide and tool to upgrade legacy PowerShell Pester test suites across major versions (v3→v4, v4→v5, v5→v6). It covers structural changes, syntax updates, and breaking changes related to the Discovery/Run model, mock handling, and configuration updates. Use this when modernizing or fixing broken tests after Pester version bumps.

This tool guides the process of positioning a comprehensive review essay within a highly technical and debated academic field. It helps users define the precise scope (corpus boundaries), map the major scholarly camps and core disagreements, and strategically locate their own intervention point, ensuring the review reads as authoritative and current.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to academic journals, specifically modeled after the requirements for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) via SAGE Track. It guides users through critical steps, including maintaining double-anonymity, confirming the genre (review article vs. empirical study), adhering to strict word counts (~8,000 words), and following specific style guides (SAGE Harvard). Use this tool immediately before the final upload to ensure submission compliance.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.