Skill UI

A rigorous framework designed for academics to vet research questions for high-impact journals. It guides researchers to ensure that the international dimension is the theoretical core, providing 'stress tests' and criteria to prove that cross-national variation generates unique predictions, elevating the work beyond mere cross-country replication.

This router skill guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage process of developing and submitting high-quality manuscripts for the Journal of International Marketing (JIM). It helps users navigate crucial steps, from initial topic selection and theory development (ensuring the international dimension is theoretical, not just setting) to rigorous methods design, data analysis (including invariance testing), and final submission preparation. It serves as a structural map for academic writing in international marketing.

A guide for researchers on determining if their macro or finance paper has a load-bearing international or open-economy dimension. It provides specific tests and reframing techniques to ensure the core contribution is cross-border, preventing misrouted submissions to top academic journals.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing manuscripts intended for the Journal of International Money and Finance (JIMF). It guides authors through the entire research lifecycle, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous empirical design, robustness checks, figure creation, and final rebuttal planning. It ensures the paper meets the high standards required for open-economy macro-finance submissions.

This guide helps researchers refine and vet their law-and-economics research questions to determine the optimal journal venue (e.g., JLE, JLO, JLEO). It provides a detailed 'fit test' and checklist, ensuring the project centers on a core legal/regulatory institution and uses a credible empirical or theoretical design, moving beyond merely descriptive data analysis.

This skill acts as a central router for manuscripts targeting The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE). It guides the user through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous identification, robustness testing, writing, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps diagnose the current bottleneck and suggests the next specialized skill to use, ensuring adherence to JLE's high standards for empirical economic analysis of law.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers pitching topics to the Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). This skill helps authors test whether their research contribution is genuinely rooted in institutional or organizational claims, rather than being a pure market outcome or a general micro-economics finding. It refines the focus, mechanism, and intended academic audience.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for researchers targeting The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). It guides users through the entire academic process, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to developing models, ensuring robustness, and handling revision and rebuttal stages. It helps diagnose current bottlenecks and determines the optimal next specialized skill to use.

This guide helps researchers sharpen and validate their research questions to ensure they meet the rigorous standards of top marketing journals (like JM). It focuses on testing for substantive importance, dual relevance (bridging theory and practice), and overall fit, helping users differentiate if their work belongs in JM, JMR, Marketing Science, or elsewhere. It emphasizes an empirics-first approach.

This comprehensive router guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for submission to the Journal of Marketing (JM). It is not a replacement for specialized skills but provides a structured path, helping users determine the next necessary step—from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and rebuttal drafting. It emphasizes ensuring the research has substantive, real-world managerial or societal relevance.

A comprehensive guide for economists and researchers on determining if their work concerning monetary policy, banking, credit, or macro-finance is a suitable fit for the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It teaches how to structure arguments, identify clear policy stakes, and differentiate the unique scope of JMCB from similar academic outlets.

This tool guides researchers through the entire process of preparing a manuscript for submission to the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It acts as a structured router, diagnosing bottlenecks and recommending the next specialized skill (e.g., identification, empirical design, rebuttal) needed at each stage, from topic selection to final revision.