Skill UI

This router guides the entire lifecycle of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript, from initial topic selection to final submission and revision. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the correct next step, ensuring the conceptual advance is properly framed, argued, and polished for high-level academic journals. Essential for structuring complex theoretical contributions.

This guide provides researchers with a critical framework for determining if their work on algorithms, data structures, and discrete mathematics is suitable for SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms). It outlines a rigorous three-question fit test, offers a routing map to comparable specialized venues (like STOC or FOCS), and clarifies the specific academic pattern required for a submission to be considered novel and impactful to an algorithms expert.

This guide helps researchers evaluate if their systems project meets the standards of top-tier conferences like SOSP. It details the critical 'SOSP shape test'—requiring an extractable Principle, a real Embodiment, and evidence at the claim's scale. It provides a routing table to recommend the most appropriate venue (e.g., OSDI, NSDI) based on the project's center of gravity.

This skill is designed to help researchers critically assess whether their project aligns with the scope of Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It guides users to pressure-test the core contribution: the link between social structure, process, and the individual. It helps frame the research question, determine the appropriate tradition (e.g., identity theory, symbolic interaction), and decide whether the final output should be a full Article or a focused Note.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for researchers to assess the scientific value, originality, and scope of their research findings. It helps determine if a topic is suitable for high-level journals like Scientia Sinica Informationis (SSI), guides the choice between Chinese and English versions, and advises on the appropriate journal fit and article column (e.g., Review, Paper, Letter). Ideal for pre-submission planning and refining research focus.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for manuscript authors targeting the StarSem Conference on Computational Semantics (*SEM). It helps authors determine the conference fit, refine framing, establish the necessary evidence bar, and strategize submissions for topics related to meaning representation, semantic parsing, and inference. It is a specialized venue-selection and re-framing tool for advanced NLP/CS papers.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the scope and general significance of their theoretical computer science work. It introduces the 'breadth test' (corridor, lineage, technique) and a detailed routing map to advise whether the paper is best suited for a flagship, broad-scope venue like STOC, or a more specialized conference (e.g., SODA, ITCS, CCC). It provides a structured decision procedure for optimizing academic publication success.

This guide assists researchers in determining the optimal venue for their formal verification project. It helps decide whether the work belongs at TACAS (ETAPS) or a sibling conference (like CAV or VMCAI), depending on the emphasis (tool vs. theory), and guides the selection among the four distinct contribution categories (Research, Tool, Case-study, Demonstration).

A comprehensive guide for accounting researchers on refining and scoping a high-quality research question suitable for top-tier journals like The Accounting Review (TAR). It teaches critical criteria, including ensuring the question is accounting-centered, methodologically identifiable, and makes a significant theoretical contribution, while also advising on the best fit among competing academic venues (TAR vs. JAR/JAE).

This comprehensive guide serves as a router for structuring a high-quality academic manuscript targeting The Accounting Review (TAR). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current stage of the research—whether it's an initial vague idea, preliminary results, or addressing reviewer feedback—and recommends the next specialized skill module to use, ensuring a methodical progression from topic selection through final rebuttal.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference (UAI, AISTATS, NeurIPS, ICML, etc.) for their work, particularly when the core contribution revolves around uncertainty representation, probabilistic reasoning, or causal inference. It provides detailed filters and comparison points to refine the paper's scope and target audience.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.