Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for ensuring robust scientific reproducibility in robotics research (RSS). It structures evidence into distinct 'Replication Tiers' (e.g., Rerunnable, Auditable), distinguishing between the computational half (code, seeds) and the physical half (robot, environment, human protocol). It mandates the use of platform ledgers and raw trial logs to convert claims of trust into verifiable, auditable evidence.

A comprehensive guide detailing the highly structured, multi-stage peer review process used by top-tier robotics conferences (such as RSS). It covers the mechanics from double-blind submission and threshold gating to the role of the Area Chair. Learn how to structure your arguments, write compelling rebuttals, and summarize findings to maximize acceptance chances in highly selective academic venues.

A comprehensive, final-stage audit guide for submitting papers to highly selective robotics conferences like RSS. It details the multi-stage deadline cascade, adherence to strict double-blind review rules, self-containment standards, and formatting requirements to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide details the best practices for structuring supplementary materials for scientific conferences, ensuring the main paper remains self-contained. It covers transforming raw data, failure logs, and robotic videos into credible evidence annexes. Key areas include anonymization of media, maintaining archive hygiene, and structuring appendices to deepen belief without being mandatory for understanding the core claims.

This skill provides a detailed framework for researchers to determine the most suitable venue (e.g., RSS, ICRA, CoRL, IROS) for their robotics project paper. It teaches how to shift focus from merely demonstrating a system's capabilities to articulating a precise, testable scientific claim, ensuring the work is optimally presented to the target academic community.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management framework for submitting research to major robotics conferences, particularly RSS. It maps out the complex annual cycle, from abstract submission to final presentation, detailing critical deadlines, required milestones (like hardware trials and writing drafts), and fallback options at sibling venues (IROS, CoRL, ICRA). Essential for researchers managing time-sensitive academic pipelines.

A comprehensive guide for technical writers revising manuscripts for top-tier robotics venues. It emphasizes shifting the paper's focus from system demonstrations to a primary, falsifiable scientific claim. Learn to structure your argument, size evidence to the claim scope, pre-answer reviewer critiques, maintain extreme concision, and report failures with scientific rigor.

This skill guides authors through the complex process of selecting the optimal academic journal venue for their research. It profiles the paper's characteristics (discipline, method, contribution) and shortlists potential targets from a large index. It scores candidates based on fit, acceptance odds, turnaround time, and audience, providing a tiered recommendation (Reach, Match, Safe) and a detailed resubmission ladder. Ideal for rejected drafts or papers needing a first target.

This comprehensive tool guides researchers in drafting rigorous, point-by-point responses to referee reports (R&R). It ensures that every comment is systematically addressed, classifying fixes and providing structured revisions. Critically, it mandates that all substantive fixes must be backed by real, reproducible re-runs, citing specific numbers generated via an execution bridge to maintain scientific rigor.

This toolkit guides the entire academic publishing lifecycle, acting as a central router across multiple venues. It sequences critical steps—from selecting the ideal target journal (`rt-journal-match`) through data execution, submission readiness checks, simulated referee review, point-by-point rebuttal drafting, and generating the final replication package. It provides a structured, end-to-end process for researchers submitting complex manuscripts.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for academic manuscript submission to 'Rural Economy.' It helps users evaluate if their research topic, methodology, and structure align with the journal's academic scope, covering critical areas like rural revitalization, county economy, and agricultural policy. It outlines key structural requirements and common submission pitfalls to enhance the chances of acceptance.

This comprehensive guide provides structured rules for writing the two most critical components for high-impact scientific submissions (like Science/AAAS): a one-sentence summary and a polished abstract. It teaches authors how to shift focus from methodology to quantified results and broad implications, ensuring the work is accessible and compelling to a general scientific readership.