Skill UI

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging and presenting research artifacts (code, data, models, benchmarks) submitted to NeurIPS. It details requirements for anonymous review packages, public release, and ensures scientific claims are reproducible by providing necessary metadata, licenses, and execution details.

A detailed guide for authors drafting responses, rebuttals, and discussions for major conferences like NeurIPS. It emphasizes adhering to strict double-blind constraints, focusing on technical evidence rather than arguing tone, and structuring responses to clarify misunderstandings and move reviewers toward an accurate decision.

This comprehensive guide outlines the necessary steps and artifacts required for submitting a camera-ready version of an accepted NeurIPS paper. It covers de-anonymization, updating metadata, resolving final content issues, and ensuring all public-facing elements meet official guidelines.

A comprehensive guide for stress-testing the evidence supporting ML claims before submitting to top-tier academic conferences. Covers rigorous auditing of baselines, ablation studies, robustness checks, data leakage, and calibrating claims against evidence strength, ensuring scientific reproducibility.

This skill guides authors on how to strategically position their machine learning research against complex academic landscapes. It covers comparing work to neighboring conferences (ICML, ICLR), analyzing contemporaneous preprints, and defining the exact technical delta from prior methods to minimize novelty risk for top-tier AI venues.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to machine learning conferences like NeurIPS. It details the rigorous standards for data splitting, hyperparameter reporting, random-seed protocols, and compute transparency required for a main-track paper. It also helps authors strategically decide between the main track and the MLRC/TMLR routes based on their core contribution (replication vs. novelty).

This skill simulates the rigorous peer review process used in top-tier AI and machine learning conferences (like NeurIPS). It helps users diagnose potential weaknesses in a submission regarding quality, clarity, significance, ethical compliance, and reproducibility. It guides the identification of decision-relevant issues that ACs and reviewers are likely to raise, helping authors strategically plan responses for revision.

A comprehensive audit tool designed to ensure academic paper compliance before submitting to major AI conferences like NeurIPS. It systematically checks adherence to the CFP, double-blind anonymity across all assets (PDF, code, data, supplement), correct track selection, and avoids common desk-rejection pitfalls, ensuring the submission is ready for OpenReview.

A comprehensive guide on structuring research papers for top-tier AI conferences (like NeurIPS). It teaches authors how to strategically allocate contributions, proofs, data details, and code artifacts across the main body, text appendices, and separate ZIP files. Use this skill to ensure reviewers can easily identify the core contribution and assess the work's validity without missing crucial supporting details.

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous validation process of their AI/ML paper for NeurIPS. It helps determine if the core contribution is robust enough for the main track, suggests the most appropriate NeurIPS track (e.g., E&D, Position), and refines the contribution type (Theory, Use-Inspired, etc.) to maximize the chances of acceptance.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the NeurIPS academic workflow. It guides users through every stage of preparing a machine learning manuscript, from initial topic and track selection to writing, mandatory paper checklist completion, OpenReview submission, handling the double-blind review process, and finalizing the camera-ready version. It helps ensure the manuscript is robust, evidence-backed, and adheres to all conference policies.

A comprehensive guide for refining machine learning research papers tailored for NeurIPS submission. It teaches how to structure introductions, calibrate claims with evidence, explicitly state limitations, and address mandatory academic checklist items (e.g., reproducibility, broader impact). Use this skill to transform technical writing into a reviewer-proof, high-impact academic manuscript.