Skill UI

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers determine the optimal top-tier conference venue for their computer architecture work. It provides detailed criteria—such as mechanism-residency tests, hardware cost analysis, and scope boundaries—to guide authors in correctly placing their research between venues like MICRO, ISCA, ASPLOS, and DAC.

This guide maps out the complex, multi-year pipeline for submitting research papers to top-tier computer architecture conferences (e.g., MICRO, ISCA, ASPLOS, HPCA). It details the entire lifecycle, from initial abstract submission and revision through simulation, implementation, and final symposium presentation. It critically emphasizes that the evaluation schedule—the compute-bound sweep queues and simulation cycles—is the most critical path and primary bottleneck for academic research.

A comprehensive project management guide for the MLSys conference submission cycle. It covers the entire research lifecycle, from initial venue selection and track choice through paper submission, review responses, artifact evaluation, and final conference presentation. The guide emphasizes backward planning, managing critical resources like shared GPU time, and mitigating common failure modes.

This guide details the rigorous process for packaging research artifacts in mobile communications for academic evaluation committees (AEC). It emphasizes creating a hardware-optional path, defining claims (badges), and ensuring reproducibility through smoke runs, recorded replay paths, and permanent DOI-backed archiving, allowing evaluation even without specialized lab equipment.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices and an audit checklist for designing robust, real-world experiments in mobile and wireless communication systems. It emphasizes moving beyond simulations, detailing necessary RF setups, quantifiable energy metrics, and reporting statistical distributions to ensure high academic credibility.

A comprehensive guide to ensuring reproducibility in radio frequency (RF) physical layer measurements. It details the necessity of maintaining a detailed provenance ledger—recording radio hardware, channel conditions, mobility patterns, and software versions at the time of the run. The goal is not bit-identical results, but documenting variance and methodology so that findings can be validated on different testbeds or later in time, while also addressing legal and ethical data shipping constraints.

This comprehensive audit checklist guides authors through the final pre-upload steps for major academic conferences like MobiCom. It covers critical areas including HotCRP site confirmation, adherence to strict formatting rules (columns, page limits), maintaining double-blind anonymity, and mitigating wireless-specific identity leaks to ensure a smooth and compliant submission process.

This guide helps authors navigate the complex, multi-stage submission process for MobiCom. It emphasizes planning backward from the final paper cutoff, accounting for two distinct annual rounds, staggered review stages, and the critical impact of schedule slips on program editions. Essential for managing wireless and mobility research timelines.

A comprehensive guide for authors planning submissions to MobiSys. It details the two-round review process, the specialized pool of systems-and-services reviewers, and critical scoring dimensions such as on-device evidence, energy/latency rigor, and contribution mechanism. Use this to formulate a robust response strategy for every stage, from initial submission to camera-ready.

This comprehensive guide provides a mandatory audit checklist for authors preparing papers for the MobiSys conference. It ensures adherence to strict academic publishing rules, covering essential steps like paper registration, maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to the 12-page limit, and avoiding common risks such as identity leaks or dual submissions. Use this to verify submission readiness before the final deadline.

This guide provides detailed instructions for authors submitting supplementary material for conferences like MobiSys. It helps authors categorize content—distinguishing between core material (must be in the main body), supporting evidence (appendix), demonstration media, and runnable artifacts—while strictly adhering to double-blind and page-limit constraints. The goal is to ensure the main paper is self-contained and fully judgeable.

This guide provides rigorous structural and disciplinary rules for authors submitting mobile-systems research to highly competitive conferences like MobiSys. It emphasizes moving beyond mere superlatives, mandating that all claims must be substantiated by explicit measurements of latency, energy, memory, and thermal budgets on real devices. Learn how to structure the paper to survive deep technical and systems-level peer review.