Skill UI

A comprehensive guide and checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Experimental Economics via the Editorial Manager portal. It covers critical steps including anonymization for double-blind review, verifying adherence to 'no deception' and 'real incentives' gates, and ensuring all required supplementary materials (instructions, data appendices) are included before final submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to FAccT, detailing the mandatory separation of content into three zones: the main Body, the Endmatter statements (including Ethics and AI Usage), and the Appendix/Supplementary material. It outlines strict rules regarding anonymity, page limits, and ensuring the core argument is decision-critical and visible from the main reviewed pages.

This comprehensive guide helps authors structure and partition their research findings for top-tier academic conferences, such as USENIX FAST. It defines the strict rules for separating core, decision-critical evidence (which must reside in the main body) from supporting materials, artifacts, and appendices, ensuring compliance with page budgets and double-blind review standards.

This guide provides expert recommendations on organizing supplementary material for academic papers. It teaches authors how to distinguish between load-bearing evidence (for the main text) and reassuring, secondary data (for the internet appendix). Proper indexing, cross-referencing, and material triage are critical for creating a lean, navigable, and highly persuasive manuscript.

A comprehensive guide on structuring empirical research papers for top-tier conferences, such as FSE. It outlines strict partitioning rules, ensuring that all decision-critical evidence, core arguments, and key findings reside within the primary reviewed body, while supplementary artifacts and appendices provide necessary, but non-judgmental, support. Covers page budget discipline, double-anonymity requirements, and optimizing the paper's flow.

This guide provides structural best practices for writing highly technical academic papers, particularly for top-tier conferences. It teaches authors how to critically distinguish between the core material that must be visible in the main body (for the referee to follow and judge) and the auxiliary details, complete proofs, or routine calculations that can be safely deferred to an appendix. Following this structure prevents common writing pitfalls, such as 'hollow bodies,' ensuring the paper is both highly readable and technically rigorous.

This comprehensive guide outlines the strict requirements and protocols for submitting papers to the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). It details the crucial differences between the Research and Applied tracks, emphasizing the triple-blind anonymity regime. Key points include adhering to the strict 10-page IEEE format (including references and appendices), avoiding identity leaks in the body or metadata, and understanding the single, non-negotiable submission deadline. Failure to follow these guidelines results in automatic rejection.

Provides crucial guidelines for structuring research papers submitted to ICDM. It details how the 10-page IEEE limit must accommodate the body, in-cap appendices, and references, while effectively offloading bulk material (code, full logs) to an external repository. Essential for avoiding rejection due to page overruns.

This guide outlines the specific expectations for preparing the 'artifact' when submitting papers to the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). It clarifies that ICDT is a pure theory venue, meaning the primary deliverable is not runnable code or system badges, but the complete, verifiable proof. Key components include the marked appendix (for review) and the consistent, archived full version on arXiv.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring technical conference papers, especially when supplementary proofs are required. It emphasizes the critical rule that the main body (typically 15 pages) must be self-contained and sufficient for a referee to judge the result's significance, even if they do not read the marked appendix. It strictly forbids external links or online supplements for review.

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

This guide outlines the proper placement of various research materials—including proofs, code, and extended results—within major academic conference submissions. It helps authors understand which content must be presented in the main body, which belongs in appendices, and how to correctly manage supplementary manuscripts and code/data supplements to maximize the chance of reviewer acceptance.