Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for assembling supplementary materials for ICSME papers. It strictly outlines how to partition research findings, core techniques, and evidence between the limited 10-page body and the supplementary artifact. The key principle is that the paper must be fully judgeable from the reviewed pages alone, ensuring decision-critical evidence is never relegated solely to the appendix.

This comprehensive guide details the strict content partitioning rules for preparing papers for top-tier security conferences like IEEE S&P. It advises authors on differentiating between core claims (which must live in the limited body pages) and verification material (which belongs in the appendix), ensuring adherence to strict page limits and review expectations.

This guide outlines the rigorous requirements for building a comprehensive replication package and proof appendix for manuscripts submitted to journals following the International Economic Review (IER) style. It details what must be included in the data deposit (datasets, programs, README) and how to structure a self-contained proof appendix, ensuring the work meets the highest standards of reproducibility and scientific rigor required for publication.

A comprehensive checklist guiding authors through the final steps before submitting a manuscript to a major academic journal. It covers critical aspects such as page limits (≤50 pages), double-spacing, required submission fees, adherence to proprietary data policies, and structuring the main text versus online appendix. Use this guide to minimize submission errors and ensure a smooth submission process.

This guide offers detailed guidelines for assembling and auditing supplementary materials for top-tier AI conferences (e.g., IJCAI). It covers critical aspects like separating the technical appendix from resubmission files, ensuring anonymity across all artifacts, maintaining the self-contained nature of the core paper, and managing source code and data for maximum reproducibility.

This guide outlines strict rules for structuring ACM IMC papers, teaching authors how to correctly partition content. It mandates that all decision-critical evidence—including core findings, methodology, and ethics discussion—must be self-contained within the limited-page body, preventing the misuse of the unlimited appendix space. It ensures the paper remains reviewable and coherent.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strict structural constraints for submitting papers to INFOCOM. It covers crucial rules regarding the 9-page text budget (including appendices), the prohibition of external, decision-critical material, and best practices for organizing proofs, algorithms, and results to ensure the paper is fully judgeable from the PDF alone. Essential for academic researchers.

Provides strict guidelines for structuring technical research papers, especially in sensing systems. It dictates how to partition core claims, methods, and decision-critical evidence between the main body (the reviewed pages, limited to ≤12 pages) and supplementary artifacts, appendices, or demos. The core rule is that the paper must be judged solely from the reviewed pages, ensuring all necessary evidence is visible to the reviewer.

A comprehensive guide for structuring empirical exhibits (tables and figures) for Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscripts. It addresses the strict page budget (32 text / 38 total) by teaching authors how to differentiate between core arguments that belong in the main body and supporting details that must be moved to the electronic companion/online appendix, ensuring all exhibits are self-contained and highly readable.

This guide details the crucial rules for structuring a scientific paper submitted to conferences like ITCS. It dictates how content—including main theorems, proofs, and motivation—must be distributed across three locations: the main body, the submitted appendix, and the external full version (arXiv). The core principle ensures that all decision-critical evidence for accepting the paper resides within the submitted PDF, preventing reviewers from relying on external or unread preprints.

This guide provides best practices for structuring tables and figures in academic econometrics manuscripts, especially when adhering to strict journal page limits. It advises researchers on exhibit triage—determining which core findings belong in the main text versus supplementary online appendices—and guarantees reproducibility by detailing required note components and generating scripts.

Provides a comprehensive guide on structuring scientific manuscripts, addressing the proper placement of core evidence, detailed proofs, extended experiments, and large datasets in appendices and supplementary materials for academic journals. Ensures crucial findings are in the main text while maintaining clarity and adhering to double-blind review standards.