Skill UI

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

This guide provides strict guidelines for compiling and formatting scholarly exhibits (tables, figures, and appendices) for top-tier accounting journals, such as CAR. It ensures compliance with academic style guides, requiring variable definitions, clustered standard errors, and self-contained presentation so that the results are immediately interpretable by reviewers. It is crucial for transforming raw analysis output into submission-ready academic materials.

Provides strict guidelines for assembling supplementary material for Computer Aided Verification (CAV) papers. It details how to separate decision-critical content (main theorems, proof ideas) into the primary body, while moving voluminous details (full proofs, massive benchmarks) to the optional appendix or artifact, ensuring the paper remains judgeable from the main text alone.

This guide details the structure and best practices for preparing supplementary appendices for security conference papers, particularly following the ACM CCS guidelines. It covers organizing formal proofs, ethics considerations, extended measurements, and ensuring double-blind anonymity, ensuring the main body remains clear while supporting complex research.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strict requirements for submitting supplementary materials (video figures, code archives, data, and appendices) to major academic conferences like CHI. It emphasizes critical rules such as end-to-end anonymity, self-containment (the paper must stand alone), proper data archiving, and handling multiple submission stages (review vs. publication).

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory submission requirements for major AI conferences like CIKM. It covers critical areas such as strict page budget rules (including appendices), mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure, EasyChair nomination processes, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and adhering to crucial deadlines like the abstract-gate week to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting scientific papers to major conferences. It details the strategic placement of supplementary material across the main body, in-PDF appendices, and external anonymous artifacts. Learn how to maximize impact and provide necessary evidence while strictly adhering to page limits and respecting reviewer attention economics.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring long-form academic papers submitted to the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It teaches authors how to strategically divide content into the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasizes that all decision-making evidence required for acceptance must reside in the main manuscript, while supporting details, full proofs, and extra tables belong in supplementary sections.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and populate the supplementary material section of technical research papers, especially in NLP and Machine Learning. It distinguishes between load-bearing elements (main text) and audit trails (appendix), covering prompt verbatim, decoding configurations, full result grids, and code anonymization protocols to ensure high reproducibility and academic rigor.

This guide instructs authors on how to package theoretical proofs for submission to COLT (Conference on Learning Theory). Since COLT does not have a formal artifact track, it emphasizes treating the proof appendix as the primary 'artifact.' It details best practices for creating a verifiable proof ledger, rigorously tracking constants and external results, and managing supplementary code to ensure maximum academic credibility.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

This guide outlines the strategic allocation of content—such as results, methods, and limitations—into the main body, appendix, or artifact for academic submissions. The core principle is 'decision-criticality': any information a reviewer must read to accept the paper must reside in the main body, ensuring key findings are not hidden in supplementary materials or repositories.