Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for late-stage polishing of high-impact scientific manuscripts (e.g., for Cell). This skill teaches how to generate three mandatory communication artifacts: structured Highlights (3-4 bullet points, $\le 85$ chars), a third-person eTOC blurb (~50 words) for non-specialists, and a self-contained Graphical Abstract. Focuses on converting complex data into highly consumable, publication-ready narratives.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission review for manuscripts targeting Cell Reports Medicine. It assesses the manuscript's fit regarding scope (translational and clinical research with mechanistic depth), evidence bar (requiring strong validation and causality), and house style. It helps authors determine if their work aligns with the journal's requirements before official submission.

This guide acts as a structured workflow router for scientists preparing manuscripts for high-impact journals like Cell. It doesn't write the paper but diagnoses the current stage (e.g., narrative structure, data deposition, figure quality, citation style) and directs the author to the specific skill needed next, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards of mechanistic completeness required for publication.

This guide provides a detailed framework for structuring top-tier scientific articles, specifically modeled after Cell Journal standards. It covers the proper flow from Summary to Discussion, emphasizing the use of descriptive subheadings in Results, adhering to STAR Methods instead of free-text methods, and maintaining strict length discipline. Ideal for researchers struggling with manuscript organization or reaching submission stage for high-impact journals.

This guide provides structured best practices for writing high-impact English abstracts for top-tier academic journals. It teaches users to condense complex research into a concise, five-part narrative (Problem, Design, Findings, Mechanism, Contribution), ensuring the abstract is field-readable, quantifiable, and adheres to strict word count limits (typically <= 100 words). Use this when finalizing manuscripts and needing to elevate the academic rigor and polish of the English writing.

A specialized tool designed to assess the suitability of academic manuscripts for top-tier economic journals, such as China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It utilizes a three-dimensional diagnostic framework (Identification, Communicability, Problem Level) to determine if the research meets international academic standards. If the fit is weak, it provides strategic guidance on re-routing the paper to more appropriate specialized journals (e.g., Financial Research, World Economy).

A detailed guide for scrutinizing statistical inference in high-level econometric manuscripts, designed to withstand rigorous technical peer review. It covers critical areas such as selecting appropriate clustering levels, handling weak instrumental variables (IV), correcting for multiple hypothesis testing, and ensuring accurate standard error reporting for panel data and causal inference models.

A comprehensive guide designed to verify academic manuscripts against journal-specific guidelines (e.g., CEQ). It covers all critical aspects before submission, including citation style (author-date, not footnotes), abstract limits, keyword selection, JEL coding, document anonymity, and data reproducibility, ensuring a smooth submission process and minimizing formatting rejections.

This tool acts as a workflow router for submitting manuscripts to the China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It guides researchers through the entire academic publishing process, from initial topic positioning and literature review to advanced econometrics, figure creation, and handling reviewer reports (R&R). It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of international dialogue and robust identification required by top-tier Chinese academic journals.

This detailed framework guides researchers in conducting rigorous and academically sound heterogeneity analysis for finance and economics manuscripts. It covers dimension prioritization, theoretical justification, sample size requirements, and statistical significance testing protocols (e.g., Chow test). Use this guide to strengthen the robustness of main findings and deepen the paper's contribution by identifying the specific conditions under which the effect operates.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and refining the literature review section of academic manuscripts for top-tier finance and economics journals. It covers the mandatory three-layer structure (Theory, Empirical Evidence, Contribution Gap), optimal Chinese/English citation ratios, and techniques for developing a 'dialogue-based' narrative rather than a simple list, ensuring clear positioning relative to the field's classic theories and recent publications.

This tool simulates the rigorous editorial process required for high-level journals in finance and economics. It guides authors to transform vague, policy-report-like drafts into precise, academically robust manuscripts. Key functions include eliminating empty-significance phrases, replacing generalizations with causal mechanisms, standardizing tense and person, structuring paragraphs with clear thesis statements, and ensuring all claims are supported by specific evidence and economic interpretation.