Skill UI

This guide details how to read, interpret, and synthesize artifacts from the central shared workspace, known as the 'bench.' It provides a structured approach to gathering findings, reports, and assessments left by various modules (desks). Use this skill to build comprehensive context, understand cross-desk dependencies, and summarize complex information for an operator.

A comprehensive guide for authors receiving a revise-and-resubmit decision. It outlines the strategic planning, required new analyses (robustness, identification tests), and structured writing process needed to draft a rigorous, point-by-point rebuttal letter, ensuring data integrity and compliance with journal standards.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing high-impact front matter for leading cancer journals (e.g., Cancer Cell). It details the structure and content requirements for the Summary, Highlights, eTOC blurb, and Graphical Abstract, ensuring mechanistic accuracy, impact, and adherence to publication standards.

A comprehensive guide for late-stage polishing of high-impact scientific manuscripts (e.g., for Cell). This skill teaches how to generate three mandatory communication artifacts: structured Highlights (3-4 bullet points, $\le 85$ chars), a third-person eTOC blurb (~50 words) for non-specialists, and a self-contained Graphical Abstract. Focuses on converting complex data into highly consumable, publication-ready narratives.

Outlines the mandatory and highly structured STAR Methods reporting format required by top-tier scientific journals. This guide details the five critical sections: Key Resources Table (KRT), Resource Availability, Experimental Model Details, Method Details, and Quantification & Statistical Analysis (QSA). Adherence to this structure ensures transparent, reproducible, and accessible scientific reporting.

This guide details the stringent requirements for writing high-stakes scientific summaries, such as those required by top-tier journals. It teaches how to condense complex research into a single, unstructured, quantitative paragraph (≤ 150 words) that explicitly names the underlying mechanism, answers the 'how,' and conveys broad significance to a general life-science readership. Focuses on structure, clarity, and impact.

This guide acts as a structured workflow router for scientists preparing manuscripts for high-impact journals like Cell. It doesn't write the paper but diagnoses the current stage (e.g., narrative structure, data deposition, figure quality, citation style) and directs the author to the specific skill needed next, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards of mechanistic completeness required for publication.

This guide provides structured best practices for writing high-impact English abstracts for top-tier academic journals. It teaches users to condense complex research into a concise, five-part narrative (Problem, Design, Findings, Mechanism, Contribution), ensuring the abstract is field-readable, quantifiable, and adheres to strict word count limits (typically <= 100 words). Use this when finalizing manuscripts and needing to elevate the academic rigor and polish of the English writing.

A highly specialized guide for drafting a rebuttal letter following a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) at top-tier economics journals. It provides a structured, point-by-point framework for professionally conceding, refuting, or upgrading evidence in response to highly technical peer reviewer comments (e.g., identification, modern DID, inference).

This comprehensive guide assists scholars in rigorously refining and validating academic research topics for top-tier finance and economics journals. It provides a structured checklist covering theoretical contribution, fit with China's current reality, and defining marginal contributions, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards required for successful publication.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising academic manuscripts for top-tier scholarly journals. It provides a structured strategy for authors to respond to editor and reviewer feedback, emphasizing strengthening the central intervention, addressing every comment point-by-point, and reconciling conflicting scholarly opinions while maintaining academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for authors on crafting structured, professional response letters to academic peer reviews. It covers classifying different revision types (Minor/Major), structuring responses for top-tier journals, addressing conflicting expert opinions, and ensuring all modifications are precisely documented and verifiable for successful publication.