Skill UI

This guide assists researchers in structuring and presenting academic evidence for top-tier journals like ASQ. It provides best practices for both qualitative (establishing transparent data-to-theory links, coding transparency) and quantitative (ensuring robust mechanism testing and alternative explanation checks) analyses. It ensures all theoretical claims are auditable and fully supported by the raw data.

A comprehensive guide for executing and reporting quantitative, computational, or experimental analyses for top-tier academic journals (e.g., BJPS). It outlines stringent norms for ensuring methodological rigor, transparency, and reproducibility, covering topics like uncertainty reporting, robustness testing, and measurement equivalence. This skill is essential when structuring the results section of a manuscript, particularly when facing expert peer review or preparing for data deposition.

A detailed guide for scrutinizing statistical inference in high-level econometric manuscripts, designed to withstand rigorous technical peer review. It covers critical areas such as selecting appropriate clustering levels, handling weak instrumental variables (IV), correcting for multiple hypothesis testing, and ensuring accurate standard error reporting for panel data and causal inference models.

This guide details how to move beyond simple mediation analysis to establish robust, theory-driven causal mechanisms. It outlines advanced econometric strategies, such as exclusion methods, pre-specified heterogeneity testing, and temporal analysis, required to distinguish a primary effect from competing channels, meeting high academic standards.

This detailed framework guides researchers in conducting rigorous and academically sound heterogeneity analysis for finance and economics manuscripts. It covers dimension prioritization, theoretical justification, sample size requirements, and statistical significance testing protocols (e.g., Chow test). Use this guide to strengthen the robustness of main findings and deepen the paper's contribution by identifying the specific conditions under which the effect operates.

A comprehensive guide for conducting rigorous mechanism analysis in empirical finance and economics papers. It covers three main testing paths (Mediation, Replacing Y, Sub-samples), best practices for causal inference (e.g., recommending Bootstrap over Sobel), and the academic structure required for high-impact journals. Focuses on time consistency, theory grounding, and excluding competing explanations.

A detailed guide for researchers submitting papers to China Industrial Economics. It outlines the journal's specific focus on rigorous empirical evidence, policy evaluation, industrial organization, and the digital/regional economy. The guide emphasizes best practices for methodology (e.g., DID, event-study), robustness checks, mechanism testing, and ensuring actionable policy implications.

This guide provides rigorous methodological standards for conducting mechanism analysis (mediation and moderation) in academic economics research. It strongly cautions against the traditional three-step mediation approach due to identification issues, recommending preferred alternatives like split-channel regression and causal moderation analysis to enhance the robustness of causal claims.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for designing and presenting scientific experiments for high-impact academic journals. It covers structuring research around clear Research Questions (RQs), selecting strong and fair baselines, ensuring statistical rigor (mean ± standard deviation, significance testing), performing detailed ablation studies, and preventing common issues like data leakage and evaluation pollution. It is essential for authors aiming to validate complex computational findings.

A sophisticated guide for academic writers on structuring the literature review section of communication science manuscripts. It teaches authors how to move beyond simple summaries by actively positioning their hypotheses against existing empirical debates, identifying precise knowledge gaps, and adjudicating rival theoretical accounts. This skill ensures the work reads as a cumulative, theory-testing contribution suitable for top-tier academic journals.

This guide provides an in-depth understanding of the peer-review process for Conservation Biology, covering double-blind review standards, editorial screening criteria, and expert review priorities. It teaches authors how to structure their research to explicitly demonstrate conservation relevance, novelty, and transferable implications, effectively stress-testing a manuscript against common desk-rejection grounds.

This tool guides researchers in selecting and rigorously stress-testing appropriate methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, or normative) for public administration manuscripts. It ensures methodological alignment with the core research question, providing detailed checks for causal inference techniques (DID, IV, RDD) and qualitative rigor, thereby strengthening the overall academic argument.